From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kip Macy Subject: Re: common gdb stub Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:02:00 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1113591431.16173.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Kip Macy Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1113591431.16173.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Hollis Blanchard Cc: Dan Magenheimer , Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org That would be useful to a lot of people. I suggested that a while back but have been fighting other fires. PDB was a more complete and MUCH more brittle stub. On 4/15/05, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > Hi Dan, from a quick search it seems xen/ia64 doesn't have a GDB stub, > is that right? (What exactly is pdb-stub about?) >=20 > Looking at arch/x86/cdb.c, it seems that most of this code could be made > common, and each architecture would supply its own version of > handle_register_read_command/handle_memory_read_command(). Would that be > useful to you? >=20 > -- > Hollis Blanchard > IBM Linux Technology Center >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >