From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA65DDE37 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 06:25:10 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1180035543.3360.25.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <4655C7A6.2050606@mvista.com> <2ded9f19fbaf49a89ed6e32de87f5828@kernel.crashing.org> <1180035543.3360.25.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: 440 ebony patch seems to have broken 85xx build on powerpc.git Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:18:54 +0200 To: Josh Boyer Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> Nothing is telling GCC what CPU to compile for, so it >> will just use the compiler's default, which very likely >> is not what you want. For files that will only ever >> be used on 440, the correct flags are -mcpu=440 -Wa,-m440 . > > We could add that to the per-file flags already, right? Yes, exactly. Segher