All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>, fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
	willy@infradead.org, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Subject: Re: generic/471 regression with async buffered writes?
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 11:00:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2865bd6-2346-8f4d-168b-17f06bbedbed@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yv5quvRMZXlDXED/@magnolia>

On 8/18/22 10:37 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I noticed the following fstest failure on XFS on 6.0-rc1 that wasn't
> there in 5.19:
> 
> --- generic/471.out
> +++ generic/471.out.bad
> @@ -2,12 +2,10 @@
>  pwrite: Resource temporarily unavailable
>  wrote 8388608/8388608 bytes at offset 0
>  XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> -RWF_NOWAIT time is within limits.
> +pwrite: Resource temporarily unavailable
> +(standard_in) 1: syntax error
> +RWF_NOWAIT took  seconds
>  00000000:  aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa  ................
>  *
> -00200000:  bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb  ................
> -*
> -00300000:  aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa aa  ................
> -*
>  read 8388608/8388608 bytes at offset 0
>  XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> 
> Is this related to the async buffered write changes, or should I keep
> looking?  AFAICT nobody else has mentioned problems with 471...

The test is just broken. It made some odd assumptions on what RWF_NOWAIT
means with buffered writes. There's been a discussion on it previously,
I'll see if I can find the links. IIRC, the tldr is that the test
doesn't really tie RWF_NOWAIT to whether we'll block or not.

-- 
Jens Axboe

      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-18 16:37 generic/471 regression with async buffered writes? Darrick J. Wong
2022-08-18 17:00 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2865bd6-2346-8f4d-168b-17f06bbedbed@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shr@fb.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.