From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA165333727; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 17:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764610554; cv=none; b=buOlAzSmZzcS9UPiKd5VP7b8T/ray6P/iwm4WbzfCEur7dcHdAYRyZNltTpm5RsrC/LDBZ79j0CRV7qSsihuYfXAGO29iqtGuXeVjDRTDfc+oLOabQUN0Y60VI4YzO1TFvdJvV4xw5DBH/u+fCkmBE+PKiWERjIjtK5WCkqQC/A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764610554; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cdX0VeuLr0pJrf1XBcYXqRguKGcku2mEEfYjntl4LB4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=o2WBpvN0DYZh4egCaJAyxSTHqKYVFFregIQrH42mG4PNWyB5+PPjPHs7lfrcpS0prw+pOKL0t2l7RUwD9XPJfWY4jpjy0hdn2qt81cMDWcgoW0VzJyRF2DQUZyMy9kncgr4Ydq3EYW6GpwyqPNHGFy9ZZqdKPj4n/i8g4jpCfp8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NxmCdIKy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NxmCdIKy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764610553; x=1796146553; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=cdX0VeuLr0pJrf1XBcYXqRguKGcku2mEEfYjntl4LB4=; b=NxmCdIKyygrgvGWNluQA8LZd+tf+TelzjQkm9VyUsL3hJ5jy0huY0fRK /pTJRT9XUfkEp+BE+CpG5OqirAMckgrHyHU52+Mj95Edb0Q9uqo3a1HtS VW64YrwdSw7SGIbg/lBaNoxbBvHbDn24GgMX6GC04+IMiu+N9Cdx26A27 I2dcJvZLr2JlfxRFhlxs4NqptcByQLixhZiuHLiXvWL3r/JhpS8oCW67e 8bDyZz7nTezT/U5J0bG/3qlYElXTmyP5S5YHuFNcUm/2lY0gjvnAzOuTC SRUtrlV/ZebWvM0hbz/YKWISjTPF40QmO411b5IsYgWODuNA6zRj30cuP Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hT+p0CQgR7KmplSjYK/5uQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ou7YbsA0RjaX9H8AcrutTA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11630"; a="66591263" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,241,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="66591263" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Dec 2025 09:35:52 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oQqDmy6CQP+MgjvCV4Pa2w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xx+VH5JtQKmWMfd3tpUigQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,241,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="198503633" Received: from ettammin-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.132]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Dec 2025 09:35:49 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Borislav Petkov , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Borislav Petkov , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kernel-parameters: Move the kernel build options In-Reply-To: <20251119190955.GGaR4WAyMn7tkLhgeN@fat_crate.local> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20251112114641.8230-1-bp@kernel.org> <87a50j5n3f.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20251119150616.GDaR3c6MW9VkFKpH_C@fat_crate.local> <87ldk2111o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20251119190955.GGaR4WAyMn7tkLhgeN@fat_crate.local> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 19:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 08:42:43AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> But we could certainly just put the whole contents of kernel-parameters.txt >> as a literal block within kernel-parameters.rst and at least have it all in >> one place. > > That would've been my next idea... That's how it was originally, but that lead to some problems with the PDF builds. I wish I could tell you what the issues were specifically, instead I just have to blame my past self for not recording the details in the commit message properly: e52347bd66f6 ("Documentation/admin-guide: split the kernel parameter list to a separate file"). BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel