From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: phasta@kernel.org, alexdeucher@gmail.com, simona.vetter@ffwll.ch,
faith@gfxstrand.net, sumit.semwal@linaro.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dma-buf/fence: give some reasonable maximum signaling timeout
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 09:03:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b46913b6-fe61-48cd-a9ca-aa2fe3a12b63@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380012b9d6f0e9ee3c2f125cfe2f37f65c1979e0.camel@mailbox.org>
On 11/25/25 08:55, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-11-20 at 15:41 +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> Add a define implementations can use as reasonable maximum signaling
>> timeout. Document that if this timeout is exceeded by config options
>> implementations should taint the kernel.
>>
>> Tainting the kernel is important for bug reports to detect that end
>> users might be using a problematic configuration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
>> index 64639e104110..b31dfa501c84 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
>> @@ -28,6 +28,20 @@ struct dma_fence_ops;
>> struct dma_fence_cb;
>> struct seq_file;
>>
>> +/**
>> + * define DMA_FENCE_MAX_REASONABLE_TIMEOUT - max reasonable signaling timeout
>> + *
>> + * The dma_fence object has a deep inter dependency with core memory
>> + * management, for a detailed explanation see section DMA Fences under
>> + * Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst.
>> + *
>> + * Because of this all dma_fence implementations must guarantee that each fence
>> + * completes in a finite time. This define here now gives a reasonable value for
>> + * the timeout to use. It is possible to use a longer timeout in an
>> + * implementation but that should taint the kernel.
>> + */
>> +#define DMA_FENCE_MAX_REASONABLE_TIMEOUT (2*HZ)
>
> HZ can change depending on the config. Is that really a good choice? I
> could see racy situations arising in some configs vs others
2*HZ is always two seconds expressed in number of jiffies, I can use msecs_to_jiffies(2000) to make that more obvious.
The GPU scheduler has a very similar define, MAX_WAIT_SCHED_ENTITY_Q_EMPTY which is currently just 1 second.
The real question is what is the maximum amount of time we can wait for the HW before we should trigger a timeout?
Some AMD internal team is pushing for 10 seconds, but that also means that for example we wait 10 seconds for the OOM killer to do something. That sounds like way to long.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-25 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 14:41 Reasonable maximum signaling timeout for dma_fences Christian König
2025-11-20 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma-buf/fence: give some reasonable maximum signaling timeout Christian König
2025-11-25 7:55 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-25 8:03 ` Christian König [this message]
2025-11-25 8:13 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-25 8:48 ` Christian König
2025-11-25 10:56 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-25 14:26 ` Christian König
2025-11-25 16:03 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-25 17:02 ` Lucas Stach
2025-11-26 12:31 ` Christian König
2025-11-26 12:37 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-26 15:03 ` Christian König
2025-11-26 15:44 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-26 15:59 ` Lucas Stach
2025-11-26 16:11 ` Lucas Stach
2025-12-05 13:14 ` Christian König
2025-11-20 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] dma-buf/sw-sync: always taint the kernel when sw-sync is used Christian König
2025-11-25 2:58 ` Sumit Semwal
2025-11-20 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/vgem: use the reasonable maximum timeout defined by the dma_fence Christian König
2025-11-25 7:56 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-11-20 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/sched: warn and taint the kernel when maximum timeout is exceeded Christian König
2025-11-25 8:08 ` Philipp Stanner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b46913b6-fe61-48cd-a9ca-aa2fe3a12b63@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith@gfxstrand.net \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.