From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F154D794C; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 14:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792161784; cv=none; b=qvoaDP/87YR7ihPyLHXggijt0m50khvFRhkyuzE9jCWeN4hJVOmEvkOOwfCTXrxSMhwqama345+W14XIjn3Rn05UGwW/bbBRpAH4mBNU1/BrXK7c3ljcPitS2SQQQT5s0Tii7kn1gHY5kbh20W4jc4hcr0toO1bI++PrnERcJhY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792161784; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GNKrYVvIUcHDGigsc/8m91FuNewSDvpZXXab6be7tr0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=n6/e+cO1f8XUwbhz4YlhkEA5uAedL5/vKG1aPMHttrkV/QJ4is+I5aPQjORtcLx6T+El5eece95v15GJD8Oq41GlMJ7jfxRddsbAjk5uqw7cfAkRdgoHYrj6BOa44w82lwpWyVisgupKbJM/5wF6j4pGgkjO+3MEmQo3iRdVbHo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b=O+sy/lrA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.21.23.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=disroot.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="O+sy/lrA" Received: from mail01.layka.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CC182A98; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:42:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id spJcM5oqIzej; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:42:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1792161779; bh=GNKrYVvIUcHDGigsc/8m91FuNewSDvpZXXab6be7tr0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=O+sy/lrAzjVg4l8yxi0Cua6MI9GttXQj1YYRuPQhyD5JEaUVOm3ex2lqzw3+SrAph vP6xaSeh1iB5+sUpnJwWA6iZ9Z1gDIMw5OsggCyJpjH1mJcMp3meLWoKpU19xsqsa7 QavYPZ4a2Hfs/vFtpf1N54/ADKgiWVhVXQkUiddS3OzP/WewWu0qSHoHDeJ45YHu5x 2mQT8Af6abmdgfVYqLxJbCq9KywcohEa/9HKUbEDjKf5WQBezFLlxcMEwNwGfc8Z8g cEiMsp4DoklS7rozueJ4aVrTFSSa2wrvfhcaX8hEKbE9+/OS9QS3A0+FsyEpbnBZAM s4xSiMRo3YtBg== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:42:58 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Betterbird (Linux) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda: cs35l41: Support HP OmniBook 7 Laptop 16-bh0xxx To: Takashi Iwai , Jon Harrison Cc: david.rhodes@cirrus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.cirrus.com, perex@perex.cz, rf@opensource.cirrus.com, tiwai@suse.com References: <87a4od3f4f.wl-tiwai@suse.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Sven In-Reply-To: <87a4od3f4f.wl-tiwai@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/10/2026 16:16, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:15:24 +0200, > Jon Harrison wrote: >> >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2026, Stefan Binding wrote: >>> We are currently awaiting confirmation of the correct settings before we do >>> so. >> >> I have another HP OmniBook 7 Laptop 16-bh0xxx, SKU D2KR6UA#ABA, >> BIOS F.12, subsystem 103c:8e60, running Linux 7.2.5. Both CS35L41 >> amplifiers still fail to probe: >> >> cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Failed property >> cirrus,dev-index: -22 >> cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: error -EINVAL: Platform >> not supported >> >> The speakers only play through the Realtek fallback and are very quiet. >> Has that settings confirmation arrived, and is there an expected time >> for the quirk? > > OK, we've waited enough long, so I take the patch to for-next branch > now (for 7.4-rc1). > > If this is really breaking something, let me know. We'll fix up again > before 7.4 release. > > > thanks, > > Takashi Hello, I saw the commit in tiwai/sound. I noticed that 3900 was used for the boost_peak_milliamp value. I just wanted to note that as far as I can remember that is the value that the Windows driver uses, while the malformed but readable _DSD specifies 4500 (at least mine does). I don't know which one is correct, but 3900 is probably on the safer side I guess.