From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix MAC address entries for 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b50d825c36a92dc2e16f486455e0623d@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <467FE6E5.1070403@freescale.com>
>> Yup, they're both marked for removal so let's just remove them
>> at the same time.
>
> As soon as Paul creates a "for-2.6.25" branch, that's when I was
> planning on doing it.
Sounds like as good a time as any.
>> Does the kernel provide a warning to users of too-old firmware^Wuboot
>> telling them to update btw?
>
> Nope. The current U-Boot code updates mac-address and/or
> local-mac-address, whichever ones exist. If neither exists, it
> doesn't do anything. If both exists, it updates both with the same
> value. This makes it DTS-agnostic, so to speak.
>
> The kernel looks at each of the properties and uses the first one that
> has a valid MAC address. Again, this is U-Boot- and DTS-agnostic.
Yeah, that's fine. I just meant the current kernel (before
.25) could detect you are using a uboot that won't work after
.25 anymore, and shout at the user. Would save you some bug
reports ;-)
> In other words, the current U-Boot and Linux code is written to not
> care what the other one does. I have no plans to remove the code in
> the kernel that looks for obsolete entries (I'm talking about function
> of_get_mac_address), because it's "safe".
Well you should remove the "address" thing, it is _not_ safe.
> However, now that you mention it, I could update function
> of_get_mac_address() to display a warning if it only finds the
> 'address' property.
Yeah exactly.
> That property is definitely wrong and should never be in the DTS or
> any device tree passed to the kernel.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-26 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-22 19:33 [PATCH] powerpc: fix MAC address entries for 83xx, 85xx, and 86xx device trees Timur Tabi
2007-06-23 15:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 12:50 ` Josh Boyer
2007-06-25 15:07 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-25 15:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-25 16:01 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-26 7:40 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-06-26 15:22 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-26 15:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-06-26 15:58 ` Timur Tabi
2007-06-25 16:19 ` Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b50d825c36a92dc2e16f486455e0623d@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.