All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is get_current() not const function?
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 06:26:26 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b53pqi$ud9$1@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030313061926.S3910@devserv.devel.redhat.com

In article <20030313061926.S3910@devserv.devel.redhat.com>,
Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>Anyone remembers why get_current function (on arches which define
>current to get_current()) is not const

Because it makes no difference at all on x86, since gcc will ignore
"const" for inline functions. At least that used to be true.

>					 and why on x86-64
>the movq %%gs:0, %0 inline asm is volatile with "memory" clobber?

Can't help you on that one, but it looks like it uses various helper
functions for doing the x86-64 per-processor data structures, and I bet
those helper functions are shared by _other_ users who definitely want
to have their data properly re-read. Ie "current()" may be constant in
process context, but that sure isn't true about a lot of other things in
the per-processor data structures.

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-17  6:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-13 11:19 Why is get_current() not const function? Jakub Jelinek
2003-03-17  6:26 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
     [not found] <20030313061926.S3910@devserv.devel.redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-03-13 13:31 ` Andi Kleen
     [not found] ` <b53pqi$ud9$1@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-03-17 17:26   ` Andi Kleen
2003-03-17 17:39     ` Jakub Jelinek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-17 19:11 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='b53pqi$ud9$1@penguin.transmeta.com' \
    --to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.