Re: [PATCH 2/9] clk: Introduce get_parent_hw clk op

[Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>]

On 2/15/2019 2:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-02-15 11:29:26)
>> On 2/15/2019 11:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-02-11 08:09:00)
>>>> On 1/28/2019 11:10 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +static int clk_init_parent(struct clk_core *core)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     core->parent = __clk_init_parent(core, true);
>>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(core->parent))
>>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(core->parent);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     /*
>>>>> +      * Populate core->parent if parent has already been clk_core_init'd. If
>>>>> +      * parent has not yet been clk_core_init'd then place clk in the orphan
>>>>> +      * list.  If clk doesn't have any parents then place it in the root
>>>>> +      * clk list.
>>>>> +      *
>>>>> +      * Every time a new clk is clk_init'd then we walk the list of orphan
>>>>> +      * clocks and re-parent any that are children of the clock currently
>>>>> +      * being clk_init'd.
>>>>> +      */
>>>>> +     if (core->parent) {
>>>>> +             hlist_add_head(&core->child_node,
>>>>> +                             &core->parent->children);
>>>>> +             core->orphan = core->parent->orphan;
>>>>> +     } else if (!core->num_parents) {
>>>>> +             hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_root_list);
>>>>> +             core->orphan = false;
>>>>> +     } else {
>>>>> +             hlist_add_head(&core->child_node, &clk_orphan_list);
>>>>
>>>> Missing "core->orphan = true;"?
>>>> The snippet below had that line.  Its not clear why it appears to be
>>>> dropped here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm. Weird. I think I may have been getting ahead of myself and moving
>>> the orphan updating code into __clk_init_parent(). I can't remember why
>>> though, so I guess I'll go all the way and move it all into
>>> __clk_init_parent() now. Thanks for pointing it out.
>>>
>>
>> No problem.
>>
>> Just FYI, I've rebased the 8998 mmcc series on top of this, and as far
>> as I can tell, everything seems to be working great.
>>
> 
> Cool. Are you using the new way to specify parents or have you
> maintained the previous design of using string names for parents?
> 

I fully converted to the new way, although I did it in stages, so both 
paths got tested during the conversion.  I plan on posting v2 next week.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.