All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Benchmarks
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:21:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0602090621o4501fb08t@domain.hid> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1647 bytes --]

Hi there,

after a preliminary discussion with Philipe and, well, a few days later
than I expected, I'm starting a new effort of writting some simple (i.e. not

too complex :) yet, hopefully, useful benchmarking utilites.

The idea of each utility is to emulate a certain use case but
at the level which is significant enough to prove that
the system is (or is not) working properly latency-wise.
This, hopefully, will help to determine some bottlenecks and
the parts of code that need to be reworked/tweaked.
Then we may use such tests on release-by-release basis as indicators
of either progress or regress we are making with a certain release.

As an example, the first utility would implement the following use case :

(based on the latency program)

- a given number of periodic threads are running;

- configurable periods (so that e.g. a few threads can become active
  at the same moment of time). Actually, that's what we would need.

- timer : periodic or apperiodic;

...

the utility will not likely produce any screen-output during its work, but
rather the comprehensive statistic in a handy form after finishing.

---

other utils could make use of some scenarious where synch. primitives/
rt_queue's/pipes could be highly used etc.


I guess, Xenomai already provides a valid amount of functionality and it's
quite stable for the time being. So it's time to work on optimizing it!

Everyone is wellcome to come up with any scenarios on which such utilities
could be based.

Any comments on the one with a given number of threads are wellcome too.


--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1851 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-09 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-09 14:21 Dmitry Adamushko [this message]
2006-02-09 14:50 ` [Xenomai-core] Benchmarks Luotao Fu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b647ffbd0602090621o4501fb08t@domain.hid \
    --to=dmitry.adamushko@domain.hid \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.