All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-ppgtt (rev2)
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:13:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b686f1e04539972035a956484ba2d1c64c826ffd.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179098253053.235005.17621157884243839447@61270ab9df2a>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2401 bytes --]

Hi I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org,

On Fri, 2026-10-02 at 23:08 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> Patch Details
> 
> Series:tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-
> ppgtt (rev2)
> 
> URL:https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/174930/
> 
> State:failure
> Details:https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/index.html
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_19262_full -> IGTPW_15931_fullSummaryFAILURE
> Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_15931_full absolutely need to
> be
> verified manually.
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in IGTPW_15931_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-
> infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
> CI.
> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-
> tip/IGTPW_15931/index.html
> Participating hosts (10 -> 10)No changes in participating hosts
> Possible new issuesHere are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> IGTPW_15931_full:
> IGT changesPossible regressions * 
>    igt@i915_selftest@live:shard-tglu: PASS [4] -> DMESG-FAIL [3]shard-mtlp:
>    PASS [6] -> DMESG-FAIL [5]
>  * 
>    igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-suspend-resume@pipe-d-edp-1:
>     - shard-mtlp:         PASS [2] -> ABORT [1] +1 other test abort

My series tested under this pre-merge run introduces changes to two tests:
gem_softpin and gem_close_races.  None of them has been reported as
failing, and the above failures are not related.  Please update CBL filters
and re-report.

Thanks,
Janusz

> Known issues
...

[1] ABORT
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/shard-mtlp-2/igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-suspend-resume@pipe-d-edp-1.html
[2] PASS
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19262/shard-mtlp-2/igt@kms_async_flips@async-flip-suspend-resume@pipe-d-edp-1.html
[3] DMESG-FAIL
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/shard-tglu-10/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
[4] PASS
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19262/shard-tglu-9/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
[5] DMESG-FAIL
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15931/shard-mtlp-2/igt@i915_selftest@live.html
[6] PASS
    https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_19262/shard-mtlp-5/igt@i915_selftest@live.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3620 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 15:24 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-ppgtt Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-09-24 15:24 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel/gem_softpin: Skip safe-alignment " Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-09-25  7:54   ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-09-25  9:30   ` Krzysztof Karas
2026-09-24 15:24 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/gem_close_race: Skip offset probing " Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-09-25  8:40   ` Zbigniew Kempczyński
2026-09-25  9:47     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2026-10-06 14:27       ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-09-25 10:41   ` Krzysztof Karas
2026-09-24 18:10 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets " Patchwork
2026-09-24 19:13 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-25  8:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-09-25 21:21 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-10-01 17:22 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel: Don't probe intel_allocator offsets without full-ppgtt (rev2) Patchwork
2026-10-01 21:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-10-02  1:49 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-10-02 23:08 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-10-05  8:13   ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2026-10-05 11:32     ` Ravali, JupallyX
2026-10-05 11:27 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b686f1e04539972035a956484ba2d1c64c826ffd.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.