From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <kunal1.joshi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW for rotations
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 18:19:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6997395-2434-4f7c-acde-d3c7e36a5544@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240718111146.665240-5-ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
On 7/18/2024 4:41 PM, Naladala Ramanaidu wrote:
> Anticipating bandwidth issues, we expect many tests to fail. To
> address these failures, we will switch to the next lower display
> mode. Some higher display modes will be identified as insufficient
> for downscaling operations on plane scaling. As a solution, we
> will implement a fix: When bandwidth is inadequate for current
> modes, the system will automatically attempt the next lower
> display mode.
>
> Example for failure:
> [drm:intel_compute_min_cdclk [xe]] required cdclk (1066500 kHz)
> exceeds max (652800 kHz)
>
> v2: Fix some styling issues in the patch (Ankit)
> v3: Split single plane and multi plane scaling
> functions arguments in separate patch (Ankit)
> v4: Split single plane and multi plane scaling
> functions in separate patch (Ankit)
> v5: Update check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot to handle
> scaling mode failure by trying next lower mode
> v6: Update commit subject/message and add driver return value
> in igt_debug and igt_skip print (kamil)
>
> Signed-off-by: Naladala Ramanaidu <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_plane_scaling.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> index 2c4490fd3..6cd7ed35d 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_plane_scaling.c
> @@ -582,55 +582,64 @@ static void check_scaling_pipe_plane_rot(data_t *d, igt_plane_t *plane,
> int w, h;
> int width, height;
>
> - mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> - if (is_clip_clamp == true) {
> - width = mode->hdisplay + 100;
> - height = mode->vdisplay + 100;
> - } else {
> - width = get_width(mode, sf_plane);
> - height = get_height(mode, sf_plane);
> - }
> + for_each_connector_mode(output) {
> + mode = &output->config.connector->modes[j__];
> + igt_debug("Trying mode %dx%d\n",
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> + if (is_clip_clamp == true) {
> + width = mode->hdisplay + 100;
> + height = mode->vdisplay + 100;
> + } else {
> + width = get_width(mode, sf_plane);
> + height = get_height(mode, sf_plane);
> + }
>
> - if (is_upscale) {
> - w = width;
> - h = height;
> - } else {
> - w = mode->hdisplay;
> - h = mode->vdisplay;
> + if (is_upscale) {
> + w = width;
> + h = height;
> + } else {
> + w = mode->hdisplay;
> + h = mode->vdisplay;
> + }
> + /*
> + * guarantee even value width/height to avoid fractional
> + * uv component in chroma subsampling for yuv 4:2:0 formats
> + */
> + w = ALIGN(w, 2);
> + h = ALIGN(h, 2);
> +
> + igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, w, h, pixel_format,
> + modifier, &d->fb[0]);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> + igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb[0], plane, 0, 0);
> + igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb[0], plane, w, h);
> + igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> + commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> + igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> + "Mode fail with %dx%d\n", w, h);
> +
> + if (is_upscale)
> + igt_plane_set_size(plane, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> + else
> + igt_plane_set_size(plane, width, height);
> +
> + if (rot != IGT_ROTATION_0)
> + igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, rot);
> + commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> + if (commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL)
> + igt_debug("Unsupported scaling factor with fb size %dx%d "
> + "with return value %s\n",
Please dont break the message string as mentioned in last patch.
With that fixed, this is:
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> + w, h, (commit_ret == -EINVAL) ? "-EINVAL" : "-ERANGE");
> + igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> + igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> + cleanup_fbs(d);
> + if (commit_ret == 0)
> + break;
> }
> -
> - /*
> - * guarantee even value width/height to avoid fractional
> - * uv component in chroma subsampling for yuv 4:2:0 formats
> - * */
> - w = ALIGN(w, 2);
> - h = ALIGN(h, 2);
> -
> - igt_create_fb(display->drm_fd, w, h, pixel_format, modifier, &d->fb[0]);
> -
> - igt_plane_set_fb(plane, &d->fb[0]);
> - igt_fb_set_position(&d->fb[0], plane, 0, 0);
> - igt_fb_set_size(&d->fb[0], plane, w, h);
> - igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> - commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> - igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> - "Mode fail with %dx%d\n", w, h);
> - if (is_upscale)
> - igt_plane_set_size(plane, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> - else
> - igt_plane_set_size(plane, width, height);
> -
> - if (rot != IGT_ROTATION_0)
> - igt_plane_set_rotation(plane, rot);
> - commit_ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_ATOMIC);
> -
> - igt_plane_set_fb(plane, NULL);
> - igt_plane_set_position(plane, 0, 0);
> - cleanup_fbs(d);
> -
> igt_skip_on_f(commit_ret == -ERANGE || commit_ret == -EINVAL,
> - "Unsupported scaling factor with fb size %dx%d\n",
> - w, h);
> + "Unsupported scaling operation in driver with return value %s\n",
> + (commit_ret == -EINVAL) ? "-EINVAL" : "-ERANGE");
> igt_assert_eq(commit_ret, 0);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-18 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-18 11:11 [PATCH i-g-t v6 0/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the scaling BW issues Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 1/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Update the single plane scaling function arguments Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 12:18 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 2/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Update the multi " Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 12:20 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 3/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:40 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-07-18 12:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW for rotations Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:44 ` Kamil Konieczny
2024-07-18 12:49 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-07-18 11:11 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 5/5] HAX patch do not merge Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 14:18 ` ✗ CI.xeBAT: failure for tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the scaling BW issues. (rev6) Patchwork
2024-07-18 19:13 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-18 11:08 [PATCH i-g-t v6 0/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Improvise the Naladala Ramanaidu
2024-07-18 11:08 ` [PATCH i-g-t v6 4/5] tests/kms_plane_scaling: Find display mode fitting in BW for rotations Naladala Ramanaidu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6997395-2434-4f7c-acde-d3c7e36a5544@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
--cc=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.