All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
Cc: josef@toxicopanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, cuitao@kylinos.cn,
	ameryhung@gmail.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 10:09:29 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b69d96a507aec382c279d62cfb038fa9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028143534.135968-4-cui.tao@linux.dev>

Hello, Tao.

On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 10:35:32PM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
> +static bool iocost_bpf_supported(void)
> +{
> +	FILE *f;
> +	char line[128];
> +	bool any = false, on = false;
> ...
> +		if (strstr(line, "CONFIG_"))
> +			any = true;
> ...
> +	return on;

any is set but never read, so every test skips without /proc/config.gz.

> +	/* isolate the configfs and cgroup mounts from the host */
> +	if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNS)) {

unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) alone doesn't make the mounts private, so the
configfs mount propagates to the host, one more per test.

> +	ASSERT_OK(configfs_write("/sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control",
> +				 "+io"), "subtree_io");
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(cgroup_mkdir("/sys/fs/cgroup/iocost_pairing"),

The "+io" write to the root cgroup's cgroup.subtree_control is never
reverted, the cgroups are created directly under /sys/fs/cgroup and
test_progs stays in the root cgroup. cgroup_helpers handles all of this.

> +	err = iocost_model__attach(skel);
> +	if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP || err == -ENODEV) {
> ...
> +		test__skip();

-ENODEV and -EOPNOTSUPP from attaching to the test's own null_blk device
are failures, not skips. The same goes for
serial_test_iocost_model_streams().

> +		ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->iocg_inits, 0, "pair_init");

This passes on the root blkg alone, so it doesn't show that the test
cgroup got iocg_init(). The same goes for eject_had_inits and
pair_init_again.

> +		/*
> +		 * detach implicitly by closing the link fd instead of
> +		 * calling bpf_link__destroy() explicitly: the release
> +		 * path must detach the model just like the explicit
> +		 * call does
> +		 */
> +		lfd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.iocost_2x);
> +		bpf_link__disconnect(skel->links.iocost_2x);
> +		close(lfd);
> +		skel->links.iocost_2x = NULL;

This leaks libbpf's link struct. The reason in the comment doesn't hold
either. bpf_link__destroy() on a struct_ops link does the same close().

> +void serial_test_iocost_model_streams(void)
> ...
> +	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "attach")) {
> +		err = readback_model(dev, model, sizeof(model));
> +		if (ASSERT_OK(err, "readback"))
> +			ASSERT_STREQ(model, "bpf", "model_bpf");
> +
> +		bpf_link__destroy(skel->links.iocost_ms);

The test never enables the controller, so iocost_ms's calc_cost() never
runs. The multi-stream results in the cover letter aren't exercised by
the test.

Thanks.

--
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28 14:35 [RFC PATCH v11 0/5] blk-iocost: BPF struct_ops cost model Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-iocost: move shared definitions to blk-iocost.h Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:04     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-iocost: add BPF struct_ops cost model support Tao Cui
2026-10-28 15:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-28 15:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:11     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] selftests/bpf: add iocost cost model test Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-28 15:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-10-29 10:30     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] blk-iocost: add iocost_ioc_tick tracepoint for per-period device summary Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:31     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 14:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] docs: cgroup-v2: document the iocost BPF cost model attachment Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29 10:33     ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 15:58 ` [RFC PATCH v11 0/5] blk-iocost: BPF struct_ops cost model Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-28 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29  9:55   ` Tao Cui
2026-10-28 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-29  9:57   ` Tao Cui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b69d96a507aec382c279d62cfb038fa9@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
    --cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicopanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.