From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754172AbYFBO4G (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:56:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752335AbYFBOzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:55:50 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.237]:20099 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752032AbYFBOzu (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:55:50 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=CO6fHhlRr9MGp9GY2jXwQZR61Cn+pcP/PcFuVAXjy38fssYaYINg1c8D+M680HjQbqy4NK1fZq2YE4awYr65sODa5H2ucHMSCqZYuU6foOpRp7G3lJMfP5w3WUPTZ5e1+SW5Xtc9/sfB/C60HtNZUlzoeb/K3fks4bW+avplazU= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 10:55:49 -0400 From: "Bob Copeland" To: "Oliver Neukum" Subject: Re: [Bug #10825] appletouch after wakeup Cc: "Justin Mattock" , "Marcel Holtmann" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Johannes Berg" In-Reply-To: <200806021640.43225.oliver@neukum.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <90LLR3uLHfN.A.NZC.LqZQIB@albercik> <200806021510.37992.oliver@neukum.org> <200806021640.43225.oliver@neukum.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 853bc4064f21e02e Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 2. Juni 2008 16:06:51 schrieb Bob Copeland: >> Just curious, why is the reset quirk is needed since <= 2.6.25 worked fine? > > I don't know. I suspect it is related to timing and you are just vastly > unlikelier to hit the issue under < 2.6.25. Yeah that jives with my unsuccessful bisection attempts. At any rate, I retested and the reset quirk does indeed fix the regression for me as well. Thanks! -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com