From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] nvmet-rdma: support 16K inline data
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:46:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b73350c8-8596-70ec-082a-e8fdf1e68d04@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01000163b1bd094e-8a191404-8725-40c0-9af5-c4b69f324a1d-000000@email.amazonses.com>
On 5/30/2018 10:49 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2018, Steve Wise wrote:
>
>> @@ -200,17 +204,17 @@ static int nvmet_rdma_alloc_cmd(struct nvmet_rdma_device *ndev,
>> c->sge[0].length = sizeof(*c->nvme_cmd);
>> c->sge[0].lkey = ndev->pd->local_dma_lkey;
>>
>> - if (!admin) {
>> + if (!admin && inline_data_size) {
>> c->inline_page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL,
>> - get_order(NVMET_RDMA_INLINE_DATA_SIZE));
>> + get_order(inline_data_size));
> Now we do higher order allocations here. This means that the allocation
> can fail if system memory is highly fragmented. And the allocations can no
> longer be satisfied from the per cpu caches. So allocation performance
> will drop.
Yes.
>> if (!c->inline_page)
>> goto out_unmap_cmd;
> Maybe think about some sort of fallback to vmalloc or so if this
> alloc fails?
The memory needs to be physically contiguous and will be mapped for DMA,
so vmalloc() won't work.?
I could complicate the design and allocate a scatter gather table for
this memory, and then register it into a single RDMA MR.?? That would
allow allocating non-contiguous pages.? But is that complication worth
it here?
Steve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-30 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-29 18:26 [PATCH v3 0/3] NVMF/RDMA 16K Inline Support Steve Wise
2018-05-29 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] nvme-rdma: correctly check for target keyed sgl support Steve Wise
2018-05-29 20:23 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2018-05-30 14:39 ` Steve Wise
2018-05-30 15:11 ` Steve Wise
2018-05-30 21:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-31 17:02 ` hch
2018-05-31 17:17 ` Steve Wise
2018-05-31 17:25 ` hch
2018-06-01 13:08 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-03 11:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-03 18:27 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-04 12:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-04 12:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-04 12:17 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-04 13:52 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-04 14:21 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-04 14:29 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-04 14:31 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-04 14:37 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-04 14:45 ` Steve Wise
2018-05-31 17:00 ` hch
2018-05-29 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme-rdma: support up to 4 segments of inline data Steve Wise
2018-05-30 21:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-30 21:46 ` Steve Wise
2018-05-29 18:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] nvmet-rdma: support 16K " Steve Wise
2018-05-30 15:49 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-05-30 16:46 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2018-05-30 17:02 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-05-30 21:45 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-30 21:52 ` Steve Wise
2018-05-30 22:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-30 22:26 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-03 8:39 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-03 18:25 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-04 13:58 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-04 14:18 ` Steve Wise
2018-06-05 8:52 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-06-05 14:28 ` Steve Wise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b73350c8-8596-70ec-082a-e8fdf1e68d04@opengridcomputing.com \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.