From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>,
"Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: auh@auh.yoctoproject.org,
OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:20:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b791ecd2-619b-ab33-b474-e2d7630eb80d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0df38331-afdf-b47c-410e-6640c74e8b14@linux.intel.com>
On 05/17/2018 03:04 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 01:33 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Looks like AUH runs as a x86 machine, which is why it doesn't catch
>>>> u-boot.
>>>
>>> Also we have already discussed this 2 month ago. Marek, as the u-boot
>>> maintainer, can you look into enabling u-boot on qemu please?
>>
>> Wouldn't it make more sense to fix the AUH so it handles U-Boot and
>> similar packages correctly even without the qemu dependency ?
>
> Determining the latest upstream version, performing the recipe upgrade,
> and testing that the upgraded version builds are all done by calling
> bitbake. Which of course requires that MACHINE is set to something
> specific, in this case qemux86. As u-boot is disabled there, it gets
> skipped. I could special-case u-boot, but I do think it's better to
> enable it on qemu, which would also allow better AB testing across
> architectures and during runtime (booting images) for instance.
Let's see how this works:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/915781/
Once this gets mainline, we should then be able to enable u-boot for
qemux86/qemux86-64 . I have a patch ready for that too, but let's wait
until the U-Boot patch discussion is over.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180517021314.0C556440002@auh.yoctoproject.org>
2018-05-17 9:40 ` [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.05 FAILED Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 9:56 ` Burton, Ross
2018-05-17 9:53 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 10:33 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 12:17 ` Burton, Ross
2018-05-17 13:04 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 21:20 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2018-05-18 14:06 ` Alexander Kanavin
2018-05-17 14:01 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b791ecd2-619b-ab33-b474-e2d7630eb80d@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=auh@auh.yoctoproject.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.