All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>,
	martin.lau@linux.dev,  ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,  yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,  sdf@fomichev.me,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fix integer overflow issue
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 02:48:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7c4b77e22bd8005ad5758706ddefe878f949d94.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbpxXqNLa02r0=xw-bHzDoO5BELHqX+Ux35Hh7XRNY92w@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2024-10-07 at 20:42 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

[...]

> Not sure what Eduard is suggesting here, tbh. But I think if this
> actually can happen that we have a non-loaded BPF program in one of
> those struct_ops slots, then let's add a test demonstrating that.

Given the call chain listed in a previous email I think that such
situation is not possible (modulo obj->gen_loader, which I know
nothing about).

Thus I suggest to add a pr_warn() and return -EINVAL or something like
that here.

> Worst case of what can happen right now is the kernel rejecting
> struct_ops loading due to -22 as a program FD.
> 
> pw-bot: cr

[...]


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-08  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07 16:46 [PATCH] libbpf: Fix integer overflow issue I Hsin Cheng
2024-10-07 17:22 ` Al Viro
2024-10-07 17:36 ` Song Liu
2024-10-07 19:13 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-10-08  3:42   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-08  9:48     ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-10-08 17:21       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-10-08 17:34         ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7c4b77e22bd8005ad5758706ddefe878f949d94.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=richard120310@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.