Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add QCOM video clock controller driver

[Amit Nischal <anischal@codeaurora.org>]

On 2018-05-09 01:45, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2018-05-08 05:48:07)
>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Amit Nischal 
>> <anischal@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> > On 2018-05-07 22:41, Rob Herring wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:16:53PM +0530, Amit Nischal wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On 2018-05-04 22:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> >>> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-03 05:35:23)
>> >>> > > Changes in v1:
>> >>> > >    https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/24/545
>> >>> > > Addressed below review comments given by Rob
>> >>> > > - Change the compatible property as per '<vendor>,<soc>-<block>'
>> >>> > > format.
>> >>> > > - Add header definitions for resets and power-domain cells.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > You didn't add any reset definitions though?
>> >>>
>> >>> We haven't added the reset definitions for videocc as there is no
>> >>> video reset client.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> So? You don't know what resets there are?
>> >>
>> >
>> > We know the resets, but video driver doesn't do any block resets
>> > prior to accessing the video subsystem so that's the reason we do
>> > not want to expose the resets in videocc driver.
>> 
>> Bindings don't have to match what drivers currently use but should be
>> complete as possible.
> 
> Right. Please add the #defines in the header file for the resets. You
> can leave them out of the driver if you really want to, but typically 
> we
> still add them and then rely on not touching them if they shouldn't be
> used.

Thanks for the suggestion.
I will add the videocc resets in the header file.