From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf pmu: Validate raw event with sysfs exported format bits
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:00:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b84f76b1-1300-ef04-9845-ff206dec9f10@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEYjQOYI7utqnCq6@krava>
Hi Jiri,
On 3/8/2021 9:14 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:57:49PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> On 3/8/2021 6:35 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:15:06AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>
>>> SNIP
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>>>> index 44ef28302fc7..03ab1e6d0418 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
>>>> @@ -1812,3 +1812,39 @@ int perf_pmu__caps_parse(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
>>>> return nr_caps;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> +void perf_pmu__warn_invalid_config(struct perf_pmu *pmu, __u64 config,
>>>> + char *name)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct perf_pmu_format *format;
>>>> + __u64 masks = 0, bits;
>>>> + char buf[100];
>>>> + unsigned int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(format, &pmu->format, list) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Skip extra configs such as config1/config2.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (format->value > 0)
>>>> + continue;
>>>
>>> sorry I did not notice before, but could you please use more direct
>>> approach like:
>>>
>>> if (format->value == PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG) {
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> this will be more obvious, also no need for the comment.. I spent some
>>> time looking what's the value for ;-)
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> jirka
>>>
>>
>> Oh, yes, using PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG is much more obvious. Sorry about that!
>>
>> While it can't break the loop, because we need to iterate over the whole
>> list to get the total valid bits. So like:
>>
>> if (format->value != PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG)
>> continue;
>>
>> Is it right?
>
> sure, what I meant was to process only PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG
> and then call break, because there's no need to iterate further
>
> jirka
>
Sorry, maybe I still misunderstood what you suggested.
My understanding is we still need to iterate the whole formats list even we find a
PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG.
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# ls
any cmask edge event frontend in_tx in_tx_cp inv ldlat offcore_rsp pc umask
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat any
config:21
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat cmask
config:24-31
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat edge
config:18
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat edge
config:18
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat event
config:0-7
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat frontend
config1:0-23
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat in_tx_cp
config:33
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat inv
config:23
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat ldlat
config1:0-15
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat offcore_rsp
config1:0-63
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat pc
config:19
root@kbl-ppc:/sys/devices/cpu/format# cat umask
config:8-15
If we break the loop when we get the first PERF_PMU_FORMAT_VALUE_CONFIG, we will only get the format
'any', right?
Thanks
Jin Yao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 3:15 [PATCH v3] perf pmu: Validate raw event with sysfs exported format bits Jin Yao
2021-03-08 10:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-03-08 12:57 ` Jin, Yao
2021-03-08 13:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-03-09 3:00 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2021-03-09 21:44 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b84f76b1-1300-ef04-9845-ff206dec9f10@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.