From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A0C13FD76 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713779158; cv=none; b=qGIUeXGUpEazc0EgBVAUqJwpD6vX7IBj1DLVv1g9Uj18UCABKpRKr/F+jGDAze3dlyAWrTAZkERY9LC4lWk+wIimoqCb7VaBecgHy5q08JTxIwf6YTbcbDTt7ylgZbEpjPqZAQsm2ekEpZRAX8ek+x8mzMMn+dg2LQ04RTqLQjg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713779158; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p3FIouUY9Y+Jr8uKycfH2rfZLOi8+Hn02PTTfhGahDU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ZbMt/7mXWET4xLSiNqyVSJxXd47q4Cb0v62Y96/+63ZGtbWpFeFb3Y5ketGyTRhSxNOjSC7RgO4k0Uc9m56WXw0juKWcZi7BMDNe/YcCNtyPADhfAyWNH1tGGj8lazgzIbeIDWMZCgepO+AZt4vBFoW5j8GD5ZbHu4VIB78wR5A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=b3+0rPWk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.137 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="b3+0rPWk" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A9B406CF for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:45:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.101 X-Spam-Level: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHWicffFUOaA for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029; helo=mail-pj1-x1029.google.com; envelope-from=skhan@linuxfoundation.org; receiver= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp4.osuosl.org 53C4B4062E Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 53C4B4062E Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=google header.b=b3+0rPWk Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53C4B4062E for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a58d2e5be8so1070314a91.0 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 02:45:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1713779155; x=1714383955; darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ff2OxUfCm8MwjRADocq5R6ZStCScj8tJMiAcGD+9rFk=; b=b3+0rPWkP7l/d9CSNlSmn1Gw4d2zSItJ4+K+UIbzNB4w8tDWLY1XWOro5LVQuAeBCr 1/e/pOj2bFFOJ0Bk5w89d49GI4jPQn0vy0ZCt9rvHwfmh3UBSjSaTuSyqGB+W8T8nIn8 NpZAhdpMEPD+OWfnVaS7zyy/UpCt0NhGAp9aY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713779155; x=1714383955; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ff2OxUfCm8MwjRADocq5R6ZStCScj8tJMiAcGD+9rFk=; b=Qgskukq8t42L6OfHlTFhj+DL/3n3KFoFxkbl9SUBrpKKAsRxhC+AorOwVneDoOuV9e Vym//o4CfjUF/Ulj4PUOpk8IWPWN2BDQECHchtd/Pd0sM5NzT4R3NaMYypk/MGCcqS1Y WjGVX+VGiqVSyZvhJSEgMoCjS9ODZvsdODB5rS1SfU/Gn32vd9749Ex/2ZjSZVxlM6xB XWBvn+BlNy2wBSTnbvSeUvzXycwQ0BK/QepoGTfc/fInOzDAdK6MnlaCZHBVzmmP7npt rs2pMCit/wbBoVptdw/FbfObHkR+/051hSnlOUvHWQrV29DnDgk+X68Ex115YF2eDwVL mSUQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUMv0o94B1ita5v/YgSaQrl0fGM+Y9qkwPuCMxFn0vn0zOSgf3k/Vlgd8rWzT5JDjbLrb3kKR1Dbf3xmjhb5CUuMsMt1vzyae/T+4WtfRgGZgdix8/tTgIEo8VGLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyfq2bcLgTXeYbVL+vILmwHePMpy9Rn4NOVEtLNGhUf1hTimi3x Wfbc98OuoHA4OEYCdecb19gWfaedT7r3XmqURaJtitLdibsT/zbt8364povXCUwx1w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFMtS4wJKLAeV2jm1trySS+2kC02GoC6YznLy38rxf1VPssrXCvyT1A6wBdmc/68+71PN2bYg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a8d:b0:1e5:e5fa:3116 with SMTP id w13-20020a1709029a8d00b001e5e5fa3116mr10675215plp.1.1713779155015; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 02:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.82] ([106.217.223.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5-20020a170902d34500b001dd578121d4sm7691477plk.204.2024.04.22.02.45.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Apr 2024 02:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 03:45:51 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tech-board-discuss@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Code of Conduct Committee: March 31, 2024 To: Dave Hansen , "tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Cc: "conduct@kernel.org" , Shuah Khan References: <97f44075-8bef-479d-bebb-f44c1a5886df@linuxfoundation.org> <49be8213-361e-41cb-af8d-cb4942064b95@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Shuah Khan In-Reply-To: <49be8213-361e-41cb-af8d-cb4942064b95@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 4/17/24 13:32, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 4/12/24 08:38, Shuah Khan wrote: >> The result of the investigation: >>  - Education and coaching clarifying the role of Code of Conduct >>    conduct on conversations that don't go against the CoC. >>  - Education and coaching the individuals on the impact of making >>    unprofessional comments which could be misunderstood leading >>    to negative impressions about the community. >> >>    The reports were about the offhand comments made while rejecting >>    the code which are not violations of the Code of Conduct. >> >> Unacceptable behavior or comments on a private invitee only chat >> channel: 1 >>  - Education and coaching clarifying the role of Code of Conduct >>    conduct on conversations that occur on a private chat channel. > > Looks good to me as well. > > Is there any opportunity here to improve the documentation? Or is this > education and coaching generally for cases where the existing docs > weren't being read in the first place? It is the case of not reading the existing documents and/or misunderstanding the role of CoC. This is similar to what we see in patch submissions - even with documentation on how to submit patches, we still see it not followed. thanks, -- Shuah