From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
"Koujalagi, Mallesh" <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
"Jadav, Raag" <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
"Wajdeczko, Michal" <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Levitt, Yoni" <yoni.levitt@intel.com>,
"Iddamsetty, Aravind" <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/23] drm/xe/log: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 22:24:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9e4c2b0ff6cb92797e75bd53a303f514b73322f.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anKTkC-thNA53RWy@intel.com>
On Tue, 2026-08-04 at 21:36 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 05:21:05PM -0400, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> > On Thu, 2026-07-30 at 17:20 +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > > From: Mallesh Koujalagi <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Today the driver reports faults with ad-hoc drm_err()/xe_gt_err()
> > > strings that have no stable shape. That is readable for a human,
> > > but
> > > it
> > > gives fleet tooling nothing durable to match on: the wording
> > > changes
> > > between releases, lines can be rate-limited or dropped under an
> > > error
> > > storm, and there is no consistent way to ask "which recognised
> > > fault
> > > just happened?".
> > >
> > > Introduce a signature identifier (SIGID): a small, stable integer
> > > that
> > > names one recognised Xe fault situation and serves as the primary
> > > handle
> > > for triage. A SIGID maps, through published end-user
> > > documentation,
> > > to a
> > > description and a recommended action; the driver only has to emit
> > > the
> > > right SIGID next to the usual human-readable text.
> >
> > I'm a little worried
>
> I understand your feeling. We've been all through that:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/amqhoFzQaf1HsuFq@intel.com/
>
> > we're introducing some ABI with this that isn't
> > really maintainable in the long term:
>
> I understand the fear and indeed the first proposals I got was
> unmaintainable. My first record of pushing back on having something
> like this was November last year.
>
> But I respectfully disagree here. This latest version is imho
> organized and concise.
>
> > we might decide to change the
> > flow or change the way an error is reported or the situation that
> > triggers this error from firmware or hardware might change for some
> > reason.
>
> You are right, dmesg is not ABI and it will never be. these logs
> are aimed for developers and developers are free to change them as
> needed. This was a big counter-requirement I gave to the original
> idea.
>
> We are not moving all the logs to this format we are not promising
> dmesg stability.
>
> The numbering stability however needs to be somewhat stable for
> the CPER log in tracefs, that's the ABI. But then that meaning
> shouldn't change if the code has to change. A new number should
> be needed if the component/location/severity or recommended
> recovery needs to be different.
>
> But like I told Raag as well, no developer needs to invent any
> number, if they don't know just use regular log messages.
> We are not going to move all the logs towards this thing.
> Also, the location of the issue is what triggers the ID...
> it is very simple by nature. And we need to keep it simple.
>
> > Does this lock us into a solution for all of this? I still need
> > to go through the full patch series...
>
> Yes, please take a look to the series. All reviews are welcomed.
>
> >
> > The dmesg entries are generally for human debuggability. I get the
> > desire to make these easier to parse for an AI tool or generated
> > script, but we also don't want to prevent debug related changes for
> > error handling and reporting.
>
> We are not promising this. The stable ABI is only the CPER on
> tracefs.
>
> We need to always keep this in mind as stated in
> Documentation/core-api/printk-index.rst:
>
> """
> The kernel messages are evolving together with the code. As a result,
> particular kernel messages are not KABI and never will be!
> """
>
> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stuart
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mallesh Koujalagi <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>
> > > Assisted-by: Copilot:Opus-4.8
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Co-developed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Cc: Yoni Levitt <yoni.levitt@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: CORRECTED is still an error (Michal)
> > > prepare to decorate dmesg with comp/loc (Michal)
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/gpu/xe/index.rst | 1 +
> > > Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_sigid.rst | 14 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h | 183
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.h | 20 +++
> > > 6 files changed, 354 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_sigid.rst
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.c
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/xe/index.rst
> > > b/Documentation/gpu/xe/index.rst
> > > index 665c0e93601c..0247a255f7e6 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/gpu/xe/index.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/xe/index.rst
> > > @@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ The display, or :ref:`drm-kms`, support for
> > > drm/xe
> > > is provided by
> > > xe-drm-usage-stats.rst
> > > xe_configfs
> > > xe_gt_stats
> > > + xe_sigid
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_sigid.rst
> > > b/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_sigid.rst
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..45d84a62f185
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/xe/xe_sigid.rst
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > > +
> > > +========
> > > +Xe SIGID
> > > +========
> > > +
> > > +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h
> > > + :doc: Xe Error Signatures (SIGID)
> > > +
> > > +Signature Identifiers
> > > +=====================
> > > +
> > > +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h
> > > + :internal:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > index 67ada1d6c2fb..7ac3954737f9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> > > @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> > > xe_hw_fence.o \
> > > xe_irq.o \
> > > xe_late_bind_fw.o \
> > > + xe_log.o \
> > > xe_lrc.o \
> > > xe_mem_pool.o \
> > > xe_migrate.o \
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..99717fdf74a6
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/xe_sigid_abi.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _ABI_XE_SIGID_ABI_H_
> > > +#define _ABI_XE_SIGID_ABI_H_
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * DOC: Xe Error Signatures (SIGID)
> > > + *
> > > + * What SIGID stands for
> > > + * ---------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * SIGID is short for *Signature Identifier*. A SIGID is a
> > > small,
> > > stable integer
> > > + * that names one *recognised Xe fault situation* -- nothing
> > > more.
> > > It is the
> > > + * primary handle used for triage: a SIGID maps to a human
> > > description and a
> > > + * recommended first action. A coarse first-order action is
> > > documented in-tree
> > > + * per SIGID (see "First-order action" below) so the id is
> > > actionable on its
> > > + * own; published end-user documentation refines it with finer,
> > > cross-product
> > > + * detail. The driver's only job is to emit the right SIGID next
> > > to
> > > the usual
> > > + * human-readable text.
> > > + *
> > > + * Why this exists
> > > + * ---------------
> > > + *
> > > + * Today the driver reports faults with ad-hoc ``drm_err()`` /
> > > ``xe_gt_err()``
> > > + * strings that have no stable shape. That is fine for a human
> > > reading dmesg,
> > > + * but it gives fleet tooling nothing durable to match on: the
> > > wording changes
> > > + * between releases, lines can be rate-limited or dropped under
> > > an
> > > error storm,
> > > + * and there is no consistent way to ask "which recognised fault
> > > just happened?"
> > > + * A SIGID answers exactly that one question, identically across
> > > driver and
> > > + * firmware versions, and (eventually) across other Intel
> > > devices in
> > > a node.
> > > + *
> > > + * What a SIGID is (and is not)
> > > + * ----------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * A SIGID names *which situation* is being reported. It
> > > deliberately does not
> > > + * encode the detailed reason or the outcome. Those are carried
> > > alongside it::
> > > + *
> > > + * SIGID -> which recognised situation is being reported
> > > + * severity -> how serious this instance is (see below -- not
> > > fixed per SIGID)
> > > + * errno -> the failing operation's error, shown with %pe
> > > + * message -> free-form human-readable context
> > > + *
> > > + * Severity is independent of the SIGID. The same situation can
> > > be
> > > reported at
> > > + * different severities depending on the instance and the
> > > recovery
> > > taken, so a
> > > + * SIGID is never tied to one severity; the reporting site
> > > chooses
> > > it by calling
> > > + * the matching xe_log_*() helper (see xe_log.h).
> > > + *
> > > + * How to pick a SIGID (the uniqueness rule)
> > > + * -----------------------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * Pick per *report site*, not per incident. Each site emits the
> > > single most
> > > + * specific recognised situation *for that site* -- so the
> > > question
> > > is never
> > > + * "classify this whole failure", it is "what does this site
> > > detect?", which has
> > > + * one answer. A single underlying failure therefore
> > > legitimately
> > > produces a
> > > + * *chain* of reports from different layers, each with its own
> > > SIGID
> > > -- e.g. a
> > > + * GuC communication failure is reported as %XE_SIGID_RUNTIME_FW
> > > by
> > > the firmware
> > > + * path, the failed recovery as %XE_SIGID_GT_TDR by the reset
> > > path,
> > > and an
> > > + * aborted bind as %XE_SIGID_PROBE by the probe path. That chain
> > > lets triage
> > > + * follow a fault from origin to final effect; it is not a
> > > duplicate.
> > > + *
> > > + * If a site does not match any defined situation, keep using
> > > the
> > > ordinary
> > > + * ``xe_err()`` / ``xe_gt_err()`` logging rather than forcing a
> > > SIGID: a wrong
> > > + * or over-broad classification is harder to retire than a
> > > missing
> > > one. When a
> > > + * new situation is genuinely worth triaging, add it to the list
> > > below.
> > > + *
> > > + * Scope: software-emitted signatures only
> > > + * ---------------------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * This header enumerates only the situations that the *driver
> > > itself* detects
> > > + * and reports from software: probe abort, wedged,
> > > survivability,
> > > driver-
> > > + * detected firmware failures, engine TDR, memory faults and
> > > IO/bus
> > > faults.
> > > + * These are the only values the driver assigns.
> > > + *
> > > + * Signatures that *originate* in firmware or hardware are a
> > > different thing:
> > > + * they are produced and identified by the firmware or the
> > > hardware
> > > itself
> > > + * (e.g. via their own records or error counters), and the
> > > driver
> > > merely logs
> > > + * them as they are given to us. They are deliberately *not*
> > > enumerated here --
> > > + * minting a driver-side id for a firmware/hardware-reported
> > > error
> > > would only
> > > + * duplicate an identifier the reporting layer already owns. The
> > > two
> > > + * driver-detected firmware situations below
> > > (%XE_SIGID_RUNTIME_FW,
> > > + * %XE_SIGID_DEVICE_FW) are software signatures: they mark that
> > > *the
> > > driver*
> > > + * observed a firmware problem, not a signature reported by the
> > > firmware.
> > > + *
> > > + * Numbering
> > > + * ---------
> > > + *
> > > + * SIGIDs are a single flat list numbered sequentially within
> > > the
> > > assigned range,
> > > + * in the order the situations were introduced. Values are
> > > stable:
> > > once assigned
> > > + * they are only ever appended, never renumbered or reused.
> > > + *
> > > + * A retired situation is deprecated in place, never re-
> > > purposed.
> > > + *
> > > + * First-order action (resolution buckets)
> > > + * ---------------------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * So that a SIGID is actionable on its own, each one is tagged
> > > with
> > > a coarse
> > > + * *resolution bucket*: the first thing an operator should do on
> > > seeing it. The
> > > + * bucket is a stable, driver-owned hint; external documentation
> > > may
> > > refine it,
> > > + * but the in-tree value always stands on its own. Every new
> > > SIGID
> > > must pick a
> > > + * bucket, which forces the question "what should someone do
> > > about
> > > this?" to be
> > > + * answered up front. The buckets are::
> > > + *
> > > + * COLLECT -- capture logs and open a bug report
> > > + * RETRY -- transient or already recovered; watch for
> > > recurrence
> > > + * UPDATE -- a firmware update / flash is required
> > > + * RECOVER -- an explicit recovery step is needed (rebind,
> > > bus
> > > reset)
> > > + * IGNORE -- ignore if the SIGID severity is INFORMATIONAL
> > > + *
> > > + * The bucket is documentation only -- it is recorded per SIGID
> > > in
> > > the enum
> > > + * kernel-doc below and is not printed on the (deliberately
> > > lean)
> > > dmesg line.
> > > + *
> > > + * When to use SIGID logging
> > > + * -------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * The xe_log_*() helpers are for these recognised fault
> > > situations
> > > only --
> > > + * important, operator-relevant faults and events. They are not
> > > a
> > > replacement
> > > + * for ``xe_info()`` / ``xe_dbg()`` / tracing, nor for one-off
> > > diagnostics;
> > > + * using them for ordinary logging would dilute the fault
> > > stream.
> > > Not every
> > > + * ``xe_err()`` needs to become a SIGID report -- only those
> > > that
> > > correspond to
> > > + * a published situation.
> > > + *
> > > + * dmesg vs. the machine record
> > > + * ----------------------------
> > > + *
> > > + * The dmesg line stays close to a normal xe error message so it
> > > remains
> > > + * readable for admins; the only stable, machine-matchable token
> > > on
> > > it is
> > > + * ``SIGID=<n>`` (``dmesg | grep SIGID=``). dmesg is not an ABI:
> > > the
> > > surrounding
> > > + * text may change freely, and lines may be dropped. The durable
> > > record for
> > > + * tooling is the CPER record carrying the same SIGID
> > > (generation is
> > > a planned
> > > + * follow-up).
Ok I realize I'm coming late to the party here - I just haven't had the
time to review this in detail. I really don't like having this ABI-
adjacent implementation. It feels like we will be on the hook for
maintaining things in the future that will limit our ability to
implement changes and debug. I get the notes that Rodrigo has above,
but this just feels like the wrong approach to me.
That said, I don't want to block the work here. I know we have some
users looking for this for their own debug.
You have "dmesg is not ABI" here which is a start. What happens if we
decide to drop one of these messages? Is it only the ID itself that we
want to be stable and monotonically incrementing? Or is the message
itself supposed to be stable? If we drop all references to a particular
ID is that ok? What if we have 10s of IDs or more that have no use in
the future and we move on to the next section? We don't care about
cleanup of this kind of thing? Or the line above about "dmesg is not
ABI" means we can really do whatever we want with it?
Thanks,
Stuart
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Top level Intel Error Signature Identifiers.
> > > + */
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_INVALID 0
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_START 100
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_END 999
> > > +
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_START 100
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_END 299
> > > +
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START 100
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_END 199
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_HARDWARE_START 200
> > > +#define INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_HARDWARE_END 299
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * enum xe_sigid - Stable Xe Error Signature Identifiers
> > > (SIGID).
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_SW: Software component failure. [COLLECT]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_PROBE: Device probe/bind was aborted. [COLLECT]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_WEDGED: Device was declared wedged and is no longer
> > > usable. [RECOVER]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_SURVIVABILITY: Device entered survivability mode.
> > > [UPDATE]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_RUNTIME_FW: Driver-detected runtime firmware
> > > failure,
> > > GuC/HuC/GSC. [RETRY]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_DEVICE_FW: Driver-detected device firmware failure,
> > > PCODE/sysctrl. [RETRY]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_GT_TDR: Engine hang / timeout detection and
> > > recovery
> > > (reset). [RETRY]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_MEM_FAULT: VM bind, page fault or GTT fault.
> > > [COLLECT]
> > > + * @XE_SIGID_IO_BUS: Runtime PCIe / IOMMU / MMIO access fault.
> > > [RECOVER]
> > > + *
> > > + * The situations the driver detects and reports in software.
> > > Values
> > > are
> > > + * numbered sequentially, are only ever appended, and are never
> > > renumbered or
> > > + * reused. The tag in brackets is the default resolution bucket
> > > (see
> > > the `Xe
> > > + * Error Signatures (SIGID)`_ section).
> > > + *
> > > + * Firmware- and hardware-originated signatures are not listed
> > > here;
> > > they are
> > > + * logged as reported by those layers.
> > > + */
> > > +enum xe_sigid {
> > > + XE_SIGID_SW =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START,
> > > + XE_SIGID_PROBE =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 1,
> > > + XE_SIGID_WEDGED =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 2,
> > > + XE_SIGID_SURVIVABILITY =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 3,
> > > + XE_SIGID_RUNTIME_FW =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 4,
> > > + XE_SIGID_DEVICE_FW =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 5,
> > > + XE_SIGID_GT_TDR =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 6,
> > > + XE_SIGID_MEM_FAULT =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 7,
> > > + XE_SIGID_IO_BUS =
> > > INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_SOFTWARE_START + 8,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..70a41bdf1a01
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include "xe_log.h"
> > > +#include "xe_printk.h"
> > > +
> > > +static void log_emit_cper(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cper_sev,
> > > enum
> > > xe_sigid sigid,
> > > + u32 component, u32 location, const void
> > > *data, size_t len,
> > > + struct va_format *vaf)
> > > +{
> > > + /* TODO */
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool is_hw_sigid(enum xe_sigid sigid)
> > > +{
> > > + return (int)sigid >= INTEL_SIGID_GPU_XE_HARDWARE_START;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool is_sev_error(int cper_sev)
> > > +{
> > > + return cper_sev != CPER_SEV_INFORMATIONAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const char *log_hwe_prefix(int cper_sev, enum xe_sigid
> > > sigid)
> > > +{
> > > + return is_sev_error(cper_sev) && is_hw_sigid(sigid) ?
> > > HW_ERR
> > > : "";
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const char *log_sev_prefix(int cper_sev)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (cper_sev) {
> > > + case CPER_SEV_FATAL:
> > > + return "FATAL ";
> > > + case CPER_SEV_RECOVERABLE:
> > > + return "";
> > > + case CPER_SEV_CORRECTED:
> > > + return "CORRECTED ";
> > > + default:
> > > + return "";
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#define __LOG_DRM_PRINTK_FMT(fmt, args...) "[drm] " fmt,
> > > ##args
> > > +#define __LOG_DRM_PRINTK_ERR_FMT(fmt,
> > > args...) __LOG_DRM_PRINTK_FMT("*ERROR* " fmt, args)
> > > +
> > > +static void log_dmesg_vprintk(struct pci_dev *pdev, int
> > > cper_sev,
> > > struct va_format *vaf)
> > > +{
> > > + if (cper_sev == CPER_SEV_INFORMATIONAL)
> > > + pci_info(pdev, __LOG_DRM_PRINTK_FMT("%pV", vaf));
> > > + else
> > > + pci_err(pdev, __LOG_DRM_PRINTK_ERR_FMT("%pV",
> > > vaf));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void log_dmesg_printf(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cper_sev,
> > > const char *fmt, ...)
> > > +{
> > > + struct va_format vaf;
> > > + va_list args;
> > > +
> > > + va_start(args, fmt);
> > > + vaf.fmt = fmt;
> > > + vaf.va = &args;
> > > +
> > > + log_dmesg_vprintk(pdev, cper_sev, &vaf);
> > > +
> > > + va_end(args);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void log_emit_dmesg(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cper_sev,
> > > enum
> > > xe_sigid sigid,
> > > + u32 component, u32 location, const
> > > void
> > > *data, size_t len,
> > > + struct va_format *vaf)
> > > +{
> > > + const char *hwe_prefix = log_hwe_prefix(cper_sev, sigid);
> > > + const char *sev_prefix = log_sev_prefix(cper_sev);
> > > +
> > > + /* TODO: add component/location details */
> > > +
> > > + if (IS_ERR(data))
> > > + log_dmesg_printf(pdev, cper_sev, "SIGID=%u
> > > %s(%pe)
> > > %s%pV",
> > > + sigid, sev_prefix, data,
> > > hwe_prefix,
> > > vaf);
> > > + else if (data && len)
> > > + log_dmesg_printf(pdev, cper_sev, "SIGID=%u
> > > %s(%*phN)
> > > %s%pV",
> > > + sigid, sev_prefix, (int)len,
> > > data,
> > > hwe_prefix, vaf);
> > > + else
> > > + log_dmesg_printf(pdev, cper_sev, "SIGID=%u
> > > %s%s%pV",
> > > + sigid, sev_prefix, hwe_prefix,
> > > vaf);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * xe_log_emit() - Emit a structured SIGID log entry
> > > + * @pdev: the &pci_dev device
> > > + * @cper_sev: CPER severity (CPER_SEV_FATAL,
> > > CPER_SEV_RECOVERABLE,
> > > ...)
> > > + * @sigid: signature identifier, see &enum xe_sigid
> > > + * @component: component identifer
> > > + * @location: location details of the @component
> > > + * @data: pointer to the additional details, or ERR_PTR, or NULL
> > > if
> > > not applicable
> > > + * @len: length of the @data in bytes, or 0 if not applicable
> > > + * @fmt: printf-style format string
> > > + * @...: format arguments
> > > + *
> > > + * Emits a dmesg line that includes a single stable, machine-
> > > matchable token
> > > + * ``SIGID=<n>`` followed by the optional severity token (like
> > > ``FATAL``) and,
> > > + * when @data pointer is set, either the error printed with %pe
> > > or a
> > > packed hex
> > > + * dump of the @data binary blob. The dmesg line will also
> > > include
> > > printf-style
> > > + * text message.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note that the full dmesg line, with the free text message, is
> > > only a debugging
> > > + * aid, not an interface! Only the ``SIGID=<n>`` token is stable
> > > there.
> > > + * The durable machine record is the CPER carrying the same
> > > SIGID.
> > > + *
> > > + * Note: generation of the CPER record is a planned follow-up.
> > > + *
> > > + * Examples::
> > > + *
> > > + * <3> xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=104 FATAL (-
> > > EPROTO)
> > > Invalid GuC reply
> > > + * <3> xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=106 (-ETIMEDOUT)
> > > Engine 'rcs0' hung
> > > + * <6> xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=103 In
> > > survivability
> > > mode
> > > + */
> > > +void xe_log_emit(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cper_sev, enum
> > > xe_sigid
> > > sigid,
> > > + u32 component, u32 location, const void *data,
> > > size_t len,
> > > + const char *fmt, ...)
> > > +{
> > > + struct va_format vaf;
> > > + va_list args;
> > > +
> > > + va_start(args, fmt);
> > > + vaf.fmt = fmt;
> > > + vaf.va = &args;
> > > +
> > > + log_emit_dmesg(pdev, cper_sev, sigid, component,
> > > location,
> > > data, len, &vaf);
> > > + log_emit_cper(pdev, cper_sev, sigid, component, location,
> > > data, len, &vaf);
> > > +
> > > + va_end(args);
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..d475e816ee0b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_log.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef _XE_LOG_H_
> > > +#define _XE_LOG_H_
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/cper.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "abi/xe_sigid_abi.h"
> > > +
> > > +struct pci_dev;
> > > +
> > > +__printf(8, 9)
> > > +void xe_log_emit(struct pci_dev *pdev, int cper_sev, enum
> > > xe_sigid
> > > sigid,
> > > + u32 component, u32 location, const void *data,
> > > size_t len,
> > > + const char *fmt, ...);
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 15:20 [PATCH v3 00/23] drm/xe: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 15:20 ` [PATCH v3 02/23] drm/xe/log: " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-04 15:00 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-08-04 18:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-05 17:23 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-05 18:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-04 21:21 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-08-04 21:22 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-08-05 1:39 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-05 1:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-05 22:24 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2026-08-06 11:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-06 19:10 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-08-06 19:46 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-07 12:31 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/23] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for severity Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-03 8:23 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 06/23] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for location Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-03 8:50 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 07/23] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for location & severity Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-03 8:58 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 08/23] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for components Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-03 12:42 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 09/23] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for errno-only Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-04 4:56 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 10/23] drm/xe/log: Add hardware error signatures Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-31 11:41 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-04 15:56 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 12/23] drm/xe/ras: Check RAS and LOG component definitions Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-10 11:31 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 13/23] drm/xe/kunit: Setup driver data in the test device Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-11 14:25 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 14/23] drm/xe/tests: Add Kunit tests for xe_log Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 16/23] drm/xe: Report 'probe blocked' error using SIGID Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-11 9:11 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 17/23] drm/xe: Report 'device wedged' errors " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-07 9:56 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-07 10:24 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 0:32 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 18/23] drm/xe: Report 'Survivability Mode' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-07 11:18 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-07 12:14 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 4:47 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 20/23] drm/xe/pcode: Report 'Mailbox failed' error " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-11 9:54 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 22/23] drm/xe/gt: Report 'pagefault' errors " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 15:21 ` [PATCH v3 23/23] drm/xe/pci: Report 'cannot re-enable' error " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 15:40 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure (rev3) Patchwork
2026-07-30 15:41 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-07-30 16:17 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-04 16:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-07-30 18:31 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-08-04 16:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
[not found] ` <20260730152121.576-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
2026-08-03 8:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/23] drm/xe/log: Introduce structured component/location identifiers Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-04 15:19 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 0:09 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
[not found] ` <20260730152121.576-12-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
2026-08-04 6:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/23] drm/xe/log: Extend components list with hardware items Mallesh, Koujalagi
[not found] ` <20260730152121.576-22-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
2026-08-12 6:31 ` [PATCH v3 21/23] drm/xe/gt: Report 'reset failed' errors using SIGID Mallesh, Koujalagi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9e4c2b0ff6cb92797e75bd53a303f514b73322f.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=yoni.levitt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.