From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A81CA0FFE for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 15:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.245]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.80246.1756826558981950445 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:22:39 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=fail reason="dkim: body hash did not verify" header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=p+WRUn3q; spf=pass (domain: ti.com, ip: 198.47.19.245, mailfrom: a-christidis@ti.com) Received: from lelvem-sh01.itg.ti.com ([10.180.77.71]) by fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 582FMEog2557067; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1756826535; bh=TgriMF9NGa+hLmUdvK+UPnBXbTb547WJNVI3XZ9EP4w=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=p+WRUn3qFRQQYx3HKS9DxfkNWjJ6gboPgRiabOKYuQ9DT4UQO3sdEtmXGb4AAGUj/ a4N5p8WaqkuwZ9XwTZVVTalUv4DGyefyueLDH0YidSwCm32uJnQ0zoJ3YviN4Uhoa2 9RtZ/2FDWLKmuVnU172nL6w/SCg0qCvxlCqguwqE= Received: from DLEE100.ent.ti.com (dlee100.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.30]) by lelvem-sh01.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPS id 582FMEMC2363382 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 Received: from DLEE202.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.77) by DLEE100.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) by DLEE202.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.2.2562.20; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 Received: from lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.9) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.55 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 Received: from [128.247.81.112] (antonios-thinkstation-p3-tower.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.112]) by lelvem-mr05.itg.ti.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 582FMEZn091168; Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 10:22:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [OE-core] [master][PATCH] libsdl2: Add tests package and ptest support To: Alexander Kanavin , Yoann Congal CC: , , References: <20250827222051.367093-1-a-christidis@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Antonios Christidis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com id 582FMEog2557067 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2025 15:22:49 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/222736 Dear all, What meeting is being referenced ? What was the conclusion of such? Kind Regards, Antonios On 8/28/25 1:08 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 17:=E2=80=8A24, Yoann Congal =20 > wrote: > That is the whole point of the ticket: realign what the=20 > existings run-ptest scripts do, what the dos says, what the code=20 > running tests expects (ptest-runner > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart > This message was sent from outside of Texas Instruments. > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the source=20 > of this email and know the content is safe. > Report=C2=A0Suspicious > =20 > > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 17:24, Yoann Congal wrot= e: > > > That is the whole point of the ticket: realign what the existings run= -ptest scripts do, what the dos says, what the code running tests expects= (ptest-runner & testimage) > > Maybe we should talk about it in a tuesday call? > > We can talk, but I do not think it is realistic to have new > requirements on run-ptest, especially around return codes. They are > expected to print at least one PASS or FAIL, and it stops there. > > Alex