From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262793AbTENUtN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 16:49:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262798AbTENUtN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 16:49:13 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:57352 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262793AbTENUtL (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 16:49:11 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Mount Rainier and kernel 2.6 Date: 14 May 2003 14:01:26 -0700 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <20030514063216.2018C6EE92@rekin4.o2.pl> <20030514074626.GA17033@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2003 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <20030514074626.GA17033@suse.de> By author: Jens Axboe In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On Wed, May 14 2003, fab@tlen.pl wrote: > > I would like to ask if support for Mount Rainier is inluded in 2.6 > > kernel (as it was written in artice info on page > > http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20021021_189.html#3) > > No it isn't, at least not yet. As it just happens, my mt rainier drive > is mounted in the 2.5 testbox though. If I get the time, I don't see any > reason it can't make it into 2.6. It's a pretty simple addition now, > ide-cd has write support etc. > Are there any patches anywhere, or is it a case of SMP (Simple Matter of Programming)? -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64