From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-177.mta0.migadu.com (out-177.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF372D0C63 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 16:13:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766506441; cv=none; b=vBPnhudXs2l1p6P1/7ZipseUimPd5o2ioEuNz9qG+AB37o+GoG61YatGpkk6ALohdJD9wOAlYfYzqx2fkCmC7H6l1yuc5MtKhQ1wJHF0Rd53kr1iheAULhCDjzoBJX3tqHff8PhjUBJbJ6UEIQk8ap1EA/ejXXJKNV6ph/mAFwI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766506441; c=relaxed/simple; bh=f4AWNzs8FniP9xvHu54yv8fcxsAALCnxN3mj5budGHk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rERh5/6RySwPa65aK6iqByuLv6rNOuzyEA3RZCmz3DEQxDY5VLPlpF8ca3osduCvErWi9XtNtcDx9wdAOGw8xhpLl4aFJlkov3b/lZDHd4W7EM1nlNoOfQ4Ljy8Hieu8rmDxInUewSk1VD3axXbDDsyXWJykWV5Qcx4xcZ0YTws= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=fhaj1Z75; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="fhaj1Z75" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1766506437; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4YA4ueY+hnzmoZPAxp82QzMFokgtNSll8hzsXPYqcv4=; b=fhaj1Z75OsmM3rGlUtwtMXepczoCUVCHfJToYMcntqzFM3i76cNy629KZJ9PokzEBJkkf8 K/lJCqOUz8tvZhipCMFmRnZv8RJ+RMY8XpxUmyuLBLEcJSQHm0UvEeCBWJgiBaxYFOUQsA KXNvhY4peoxwPoOL9vHvC7XXOqJaEbs= Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 08:13:49 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" References: <20251223044129.6232-1-yanjun.zhu@linux.dev> <4a8e3365-cb74-4531-99dc-9d2911045d4b@linux.dev> <20251223142055.GC11869@unreal> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Zhu Yanjun In-Reply-To: <20251223142055.GC11869@unreal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT 在 2025/12/23 6:20, Leon Romanovsky 写道: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 09:10:11PM -0800, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> 在 2025/12/22 21:03, Gustavo A. R. Silva 写道: >>> >>> On 12/23/25 13:41, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" >>>> >>>> -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end was introduced in GCC-14, and we are >>>> getting ready to enable it, globally. >>>> >>>> Use the new TRAILING_OVERLAP() helper to fix the following warning: >>>> >>>> 21 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.h:271:33: warning: structure >>>> containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another >>>> structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end] >>>> >>>> This helper creates a union between a flexible-array member (FAM) and a >>>> set of MEMBERS that would otherwise follow it. >>>> >>>> This overlays the trailing MEMBER struct ib_sge sge[RXE_MAX_SGE]; onto >>>> the FAM struct rxe_recv_wqe::dma.sge, while keeping the FAM and the >>>> start of MEMBER aligned. >>>> >>>> The static_assert() ensures this alignment remains, and it's >>>> intentionally placed inmediately after the related structure --no >>>> blank line in between. >>>> >>>> Lastly, move the conflicting declaration struct rxe_resp_info resp; >>>> to the end of the corresponding structure. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun >>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva >>>> --- >>>> V2->V3: Replace struct ib_sge with struct rxe_sge >>> What are you doing? >> Because struct rxe_sge differs from struct ib_sge, I aligned it to use the >> same structure. > Zhu, > > Please submit your rxe_sge to ib_sge change as standalone patch and > Gustavo will resubmit his patch later if he wants so. OK. I will do soon. Yanjun.Zhu > > Thanks -- Best Regards, Yanjun.Zhu