From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC716C5AD49 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2025 07:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1004028.1383674 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uMLfG-00060z-Cc; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:02:26 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1004028.1383674; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:02:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uMLfG-00060s-8n; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:02:26 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1004028; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:02:25 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uMLfF-00060l-Sz for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 07:02:25 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id b3c0ad27-4048-11f0-a300-13f23c93f187; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 09:02:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a361b8a66cso3128411f8f.2 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.156.60.236] (ip-037-024-206-209.um08.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [37.24.206.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-747afff723csm8724534b3a.164.2025.06.03.00.02.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:02:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: b3c0ad27-4048-11f0-a300-13f23c93f187 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1748934144; x=1749538944; darn=lists.xenproject.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ME8QyAXpUdBS49Wdak3bz0E6RrV3wZJk9i9w8pmt4V8=; b=HbzgtvW05e6shimV24ce5uZZa4LJMe3mZdT1ObUFPN9EhZVBplJaryb9IReFTQ7QXq Pkl+4cmkKhbNnXayJHOAhkkvbIFHp0VK3gyAxQX5yefxOqKVWbob8jkPnkfuxc89UKSx Vu2KLviLaPonPMRInewVSSL7wbTWjvPkkRZl6bHiFsIRFHYRl9BU8JPZo42THnyOGvn1 PQBLEstIp0o3PSnJL56kHX26yFv9l9bNd2PY6t1b/F1fqUVBT8QwY5DprTyHEje+sdc9 Ik7q9p+91ogRvujljwbvVXmwUvF9nF9WsxYWxbbD66QjlbQ7b8JoPEKkcIBWlZfVDKVo Vm1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748934144; x=1749538944; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:autocrypt:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ME8QyAXpUdBS49Wdak3bz0E6RrV3wZJk9i9w8pmt4V8=; b=uzofI+7xydGJhCv4fIeT9z0JO2kHzKpEPk/NpEku1AOGqs5fw0zS9genDEYfOSzAl3 17l5I0T2tvbalRBtD3WSsFNojSsJoh/bnhOEGS7jKVxDut+2/Y+5hNOb1D3CeAQ+zY7z 2AtiQZjK94Q2Use+6oL2VFfHf4OVXR4EjBYkSHCTRogMJqhbeQzFNhrFMgQVm3uoijI9 bzWI7DK+DKNJotvjIFJfR/pVHe9hk5YSK/zy4cxhB7imd2YaNvEQqxWOcf2f0gmeGMeX naPAsAsAD4BjhICqXLh5EY4wbKXJTyrZUw3OFNo3fQ/WUMWhtQU2avMKHK89/+V9v+zM kWjQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUHD2iMhC9EK9XamEXJ/9GhSVB1C8VX5UIMYsiAzjihIQMertYhU3LW93iaYSTDdWGZen8fcoADY0E=@lists.xenproject.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLQVcx3sJnc6jfCbFj1mmg3qc2MWWn86XHriuEVqkQSDjv6FZG TYSVX1eOv6ANIMbsnVxzeE1ne0yPJqGe1xSUdD6KSc+brzw/iRluEpipn09P6YqeAA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvfOgtFLy81/SUsa3Z9OhMXfc4kYZYb2d3xt5X2xIGSSApkRsfvyHQ3Ze7IIZ4 H1ZKJ7fo6yH4BMAq2fF/jlQWX2knLJVptIT7mURzXEk113roFdQDGiLCJRUGbUFmtC9Zt8O83Ad I16m9aayr3sfMXmBPrf8GBsYlrRSWsku/ZRIwWZ528x6gSwyW9U2q0UOYjQvxINx+8DYvFbyV5z OXVsuT77Bre570ATui5uk+kWuRO7CWzEPTEHPnKBW3anX9gYtOmK756SZIw0XDMiGdsqSzGINZd wABPsVO3oGaC0wGdCTorQaIA+8nntW0tWIAQzzEOgfBD5vNld0RQzO4XWt3rc24+Z5k0sKcGneO mmVy/doYqekUp1myI9YBEhdDiS3zYvlOLYEOR X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCKs5Cd4TR9HufkPatvl8H5FRyFaKs6ZlLSIgcBZyt5fRU3kEZ+MhiZMikFRNPAyHwyy2jCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2902:b0:3a4:f6c4:355a with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a4fe3a80ccmr8910630f8f.57.1748934144133; Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 09:02:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] device-tree: Move Arm's static-evtchn feature to common To: "Orzel, Michal" Cc: Stefano Stabellini , Julien Grall , Bertrand Marquis , Volodymyr Babchuk , Andrew Cooper , Anthony PERARD , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <20250527082117.120214-1-michal.orzel@amd.com> <344823d0-eb05-48e5-80c5-9598104f3a3b@suse.com> <28a9f398-d206-4e42-b627-bea71f038b4d@amd.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jan Beulich Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@suse.com; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL In-Reply-To: <28a9f398-d206-4e42-b627-bea71f038b4d@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03.06.2025 08:54, Orzel, Michal wrote: > > > On 02/06/2025 10:37, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 27.05.2025 10:21, Michal Orzel wrote: >>> There's nothing Arm specific about this feature. Move it to common as >>> part of a larger activity to commonalize device tree related features. >>> For now, select it only for ARM until others (e.g. RISC-V) verify it >>> works for them too. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel >> >> I realize this was already committed, but ... >> >>> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig >>> +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig >>> @@ -162,6 +162,14 @@ config STATIC_MEMORY >>> >>> If unsure, say N. >>> >>> +config STATIC_EVTCHN >>> + bool "Static event channel support on a dom0less system" >>> + depends on DOM0LESS_BOOT && ARM >> >> ... I think we should strive to avoid such arch dependencies; they simply >> don't scale very well. Instead (if needed) HAS_* should be introduced, which >> each interested arch can select. In the case here, however, perhaps >> DOM0LESS_BOOT alone would have been sufficient as a dependency? > What if e.g. RISC-V wants to enable dom0less but not static evtchn/memory/shmem > because there are some functions to be implemented and they don't want to do it > now? Protecting with just DOM0LESS_BOOT would not be sufficient here. Imo a transient(!) "depends on !RISCV" would in principle be fine, if ... > I understand we could define HAS_*. I did not think about it. ... we don't want to go this route. Jan