From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout.web.de (mout.web.de [212.227.15.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A57013060 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:34:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1687883653; x=1688488453; i=markus.elfring@web.de; bh=vZzg3hUB9c0/c2EDpMXq4jCgv8V42aD4x813zltGi9w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=G9UlO9yKVNJYe5KjCZk37NXdsSlyZrYpXszmFOM81Qe0YdhiTKIH2jauu3shJS4Y32QPX02 IM0c8ChN7PYM+tye40KxKU3/PWuN3ZaAwwchQWhUnUiJYF2ez5Hp7w7D4Hz1lz3zSLj/QdGq8 W4tBS+gUve2ScllTVAloqKO+MycKcA50JAQ9KqgRdoZQyRtxO1+1cZsz6/OhGB1VpUN8/IVmE F6ThNqa0ACflmy2d9BMhvhlE8bqCX9927jCBYWJCN/yF3zVqsS4XyDJ10jiuJLwhj/Wlb+kTv x6JIL5ukSsoIgY1Sw3TT6QhlcVG9AT/9FokhL6YRo8Zi65TJnn3Q== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([94.31.82.83]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Md6tr-1peIWk2Kwt-00a5dx; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:34:13 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 18:34:12 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [v5 0/1] dax: enable dax fault handler to report VM_FAULT_HWPOISON Content-Language: en-GB To: Matthew Wilcox , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev Cc: LKML , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Dan Williams , Dave Jiang , Ira Weiny , Vishal Verma , Jane Chu References: <20230615181325.1327259-1-jane.chu@oracle.com> <18ca0017-821b-595c-0d5a-25adb04196c1@oracle.com> From: Markus Elfring In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:nJzBICGWUAtKtg9IiLRQ4YxQvEpwWCQPnmbhnPW/o2FRMJJ1xie 9i0GChGP1en9MY2B/9y19M2ZIupZYK83Xb1BpjZta7g4USZzYeNuJZbcAFXJV9YP0VzlZN2 lDMvTWtw5W3XAMUs/IcdoEnlQrPdfNmsoB56uFarmociBNkIkgXRpVWyF6z6FDLMPt3OoIe CRgknx26gZmufzD5gR/NA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:XLGM6xeV7ZE=;a77Jk8TmogkkM5njE1V34UbDzeh BUN63UKTitiuQaLgV6Z/uMCArmlsu2GxZAeDcXG55OgoO4vWRA4iqttEtC3GwwswEIv6MF+J3 Jng+r6tq36OrkWiihG6Uf00s6iDlQaMEM1+yfQmGs0lr7JMisCVt4mDqXyo8sqzmTH+cngn/5 0dw5tL/waSvyOLlGiXwU9g6ZWOBFY4kVGsegF9JeL3vvBtFLDLhXBFhBycPRfOLa48YeIF4st i4IdELcKIeYSnPvjDV2xqPCFx1iwboLcu5hm9nearXtTDNPR0CqVjhFM2fyJAgwPhDt8KFem5 mBmiVqkAu7OWNzdeQTDJOpykO7ZSFnBuCdPY0eMgRl8MCLMSA8+CE/NMdvdlhuXSznGpOAhir mM2wYsd1FIjFAO7Bfsn8pHKoj6UpChzUBnNY4S8XEgJ2sZQ/xbXuYtNaK61knX3fz2KIH8hHR Ga8Ttk/NCaZkhlD4pS+JWSEJZOnf5UTvgZ0Wh+57wDoT/64gJY79DCHPw5T4wwwkNr9BGPOHo eMQDcU3WvpEApJwuCyuKCptVdBhucPkgX7ZRmEyACaKIr24vp6GePW5caPcD5o6MWNotD/AF/ QW7+PDKOgQr7TjgngXN0wQRaAucZq3+HIpDBYI9st9aEAcsY/N2x1ELnP8waaEvR7wtRac0/3 JBXKPJn00Fhvd+uN/S6KUq/6bUkYYI2w2NvcudQQQg0gyCceLExuqX+wJoZ/MFb7jgYYW/HFl g3HBYxy81qH7QdnvUDFxn706ar/xLrBa9m026zSpsiOhwM5anAtQ5ptQsUPF1PWz+1G8pv0WA cOzmRAMl35tpuJpdN+wzqAxKohhT5QFzu8tZLMayQqVEAb+Vfo4bfN3JEl7POvtc0OYpuZx20 yjKnIoncAsLE5cXNh7G/0IfZjPD7YA3nKCDErKL9kQIwc3YSgCYB0amFmFCgIn1z/mFnpHgeI /NSORQ== >> Would you insist on the usage of cover letters also for single patches? > > I would neither insist on it, nor prohibit it. It seems that you can tolerate an extra message here. > It simply does not make enough difference. Can it occasionally be a bit nicer to receive all relevant information wit= hin a single patch instead of a combination of two messages? Regards, Markus