From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Problems in PV dom0 on recent x86 hardware
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 10:15:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <baade0a7-e204-4743-bda1-282df74e5f89@suse.com> (raw)
I've got an internal report about failures in dom0 when booting with
Xen on a Thinkpad P14s Gen 3 AMD (kernel 6.9).
With some debugging I've found that the UCSI driver seems to fail to
map MFN feec2 as iomem, as the hypervisor is denying this mapping due
to being part of the MSI space. The mapping attempt seems to be the
result of an ACPI call of the UCSI driver:
[ 44.575345] RIP: e030:xen_mc_flush+0x1e8/0x2b0
[ 44.575418] xen_leave_lazy_mmu+0x15/0x60
[ 44.575425] vmap_range_noflush+0x408/0x6f0
[ 44.575438] __ioremap_caller+0x20d/0x350
[ 44.575450] acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1a3/0x1c0
[ 44.575454] acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler+0x229/0x3f0
[ 44.575464] acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch+0x17e/0x4c0
[ 44.575474] acpi_ex_access_region+0x28a/0x510
[ 44.575479] acpi_ex_field_datum_io+0x95/0x5c0
[ 44.575482] acpi_ex_extract_from_field+0x36b/0x4e0
[ 44.575490] acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0xcb/0x430
[ 44.575493] acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value+0x2e0/0x530
[ 44.575496] acpi_ex_resolve_to_value+0x1e7/0x550
[ 44.575499] acpi_ds_evaluate_name_path+0x107/0x170
[ 44.575505] acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x392/0x860
[ 44.575508] acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x268/0xa30
[ 44.575515] acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x221/0x5e0
[ 44.575518] acpi_ps_execute_method+0x171/0x3e0
[ 44.575522] acpi_ns_evaluate+0x174/0x5d0
[ 44.575525] acpi_evaluate_object+0x167/0x440
[ 44.575529] acpi_evaluate_dsm+0xb6/0x130
[ 44.575541] ucsi_acpi_dsm+0x53/0x80
[ 44.575546] ucsi_acpi_read+0x2e/0x60
[ 44.575550] ucsi_register+0x24/0xa0
[ 44.575555] ucsi_acpi_probe+0x162/0x1e3
[ 44.575559] platform_probe+0x48/0x90
[ 44.575567] really_probe+0xde/0x340
[ 44.575579] __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110
[ 44.575581] driver_probe_device+0x1f/0x90
[ 44.575584] __driver_attach+0xd2/0x1c0
[ 44.575587] bus_for_each_dev+0x77/0xc0
[ 44.575590] bus_add_driver+0x112/0x1f0
[ 44.575593] driver_register+0x72/0xd0
[ 44.575600] do_one_initcall+0x48/0x300
[ 44.575607] do_init_module+0x60/0x220
[ 44.575615] __do_sys_init_module+0x17f/0x1b0
[ 44.575623] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x170
[ 44.575685] 1 of 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 4
[ 44.575695] call 1: op=1 result=-1 caller=xen_extend_mmu_update+0x4e/0xd0
pars=ffff888267e25ad0 1 0 7ff0 args=9ba37a678 80000000feec2073
The pte value of the mmu_update call is 80000000feec2073, which is rejected by
the hypervisor with -EPERM.
Before diving deep into the UCSI internals, is it possible that the hypervisor
needs some update (IOW: could it be the mapping attempt should rather be
honored, as there might be an I/O resources at this position which dom0 needs
to access for using the related hardware?)
Juergen
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-08 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 8:15 Jürgen Groß [this message]
2024-07-08 8:32 ` Problems in PV dom0 on recent x86 hardware Andrew Cooper
2024-07-08 8:48 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-07-08 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-08 9:08 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-08 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-08 21:30 ` Jason Andryuk
2024-07-09 6:24 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-09 6:36 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-07-09 7:01 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-09 10:56 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-07-09 13:08 ` Jason Andryuk
2024-07-12 10:35 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-07-12 13:46 ` Juergen Gross
2024-07-12 14:00 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-07-12 14:09 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-16 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-16 14:21 ` Jason Andryuk
2025-01-17 10:40 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-16 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-09 7:13 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-09 7:35 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=baade0a7-e204-4743-bda1-282df74e5f89@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.