From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Remove cifs_truncate_page() as it should be superfluous
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:23:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bac53deae60fbf5dbcb19feb403d9e9f@manguebit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559573.1743519662@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:
> The calls to cifs_truncate_page() should be superfluous as the places that
> call it also call truncate_setsize() or cifs_setsize() and therefore
> truncate_pagecache() which should also clear the tail part of the folio
> containing the EOF marker.
>
> Further, smb3_simple_falloc() calls both cifs_setsize() and
> truncate_setsize() in addition to cifs_truncate_page().
>
> Remove the superfluous calls.
>
> This gets rid of another function referring to struct page.
>
> [Should cifs_setsize() also set inode->i_blocks?]
I don't think that's necessary as the current inode will be marked for
revalidation (e.g. cifsInodeInfo::time is set to 0), so next call to
cifs_fattr_to_inode() will update inode->i_blocks. If it isn't being
updated, then I'm missing something else.
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
> cc: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
> cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> fs/smb/client/cifsfs.h | 1 -
> fs/smb/client/inode.c | 19 -------------------
> fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 15:01 [PATCH] cifs: Remove cifs_truncate_page() as it should be superfluous David Howells
2025-04-02 15:23 ` Paulo Alcantara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bac53deae60fbf5dbcb19feb403d9e9f@manguebit.com \
--to=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.