All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Neronin, Niklas" <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
To: "Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/4 RFC] An alternative dma_in_range() implementation
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:18:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bba69805-b28d-42f2-aa44-107a5700a8d3@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220131451.6f356f31@foxbook>



On 20/02/2025 14.14, Michał Pecio wrote:
> Here's my attempt at it, the patch goes on top of the whole series. It
> compiles and passes basic testing (some URBs completed, some unlinked,
> no errors or other malfunction apparent).
> 
> The idea is to translate dma to trb* ASAP and work with that, because
> all data structures use trb* so the code gets shorter and less verbose.
> This approach is also easy to adapt to changes in handle_tx_event(),
> for example it could trivially return trb* instead of seg* or take trb*
> (with or without accompanying seg*) and return bool or even seg*.
> 
> I tried to make the common case (start_seg == end_seg) fast, both for
> hit and miss. 5 comparisons if the range wraps around, 4 if it doesn't.
> 

Thanks, I have a similar version. If it's alright with you, I'll try to
combine your version and mine into one and add it to trb_in_td-v2.

Thanks,
Niklas

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index 600842425f6d..b18e7fd7d01e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -300,42 +300,36 @@ static struct xhci_segment *dma_in_range(struct xhci_segment *start_seg, union x
>  					 dma_addr_t dma)
>  {
>  	struct xhci_segment *seg = start_seg;
> +	union xhci_trb *trb;
>  
> -	if (start_seg == end_seg) {
> -		if (start_trb <= end_trb) {
> -			if (xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(start_seg, start_trb) <= dma &&
> -			    dma <= xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(end_seg, end_trb))
> -				return seg;
> -			return NULL;
> +	/* check if dma is a TRB in start_seg */
> +	if (in_range(dma, seg->dma, TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE)) {
> +		trb = seg->trbs + (dma - seg->dma) / sizeof(*trb);
> +
> +		if (trb >= start_trb)
> +			/* check if the range covers it and we are done */
> +			return (end_seg != seg || trb <= end_trb) ? seg : NULL;
> +
> +		/* check if the range circles back to the beginning of start_seg */
> +		return (end_seg == seg && end_trb < start_trb && trb <= end_trb) ? seg : NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* stop if the range doesn't pass through any other segment */
> +	if (end_seg == seg && (end_trb >= start_trb || seg->next == seg))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	/* search remaining segments knowing that start_trb isn't there */
> +	do {
> +		seg = seg->next;
> +
> +		if (in_range(dma, seg->dma, TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE)) {
> +			trb = seg->trbs + (dma - seg->dma) / sizeof(*trb);
> +
> +			return (seg != end_seg || trb <= end_trb) ? seg : NULL;
>  		}
> +	} while (seg != end_seg && seg != start_seg);
>  
> -		/* Edge case, the TD wrapped around to the start segment. */
> -		if (xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(end_seg, end_trb) < dma &&
> -		    dma < xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(start_seg, start_trb))
> -			return NULL;
> -		if (seg->dma <= dma && dma <= (seg->dma + TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE))
> -			return seg;
> -		seg = seg->next;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Loop through segment which don't contain the DMA address. */
> -	while (dma < seg->dma || (seg->dma + TRB_SEGMENT_SIZE) <= dma) {
> -		if (seg == end_seg)
> -			return NULL;
> -
> -		seg = seg->next;
> -		if (seg == start_seg)
> -			return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (seg == start_seg) {
> -		if (dma < xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(start_seg, start_trb))
> -			return NULL;
> -	} else if (seg == end_seg) {
> -		if (xhci_trb_virt_to_dma(end_seg, end_trb) < dma)
> -			return NULL;
> -	}
> -	return seg;
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static struct xhci_segment *trb_in_td(struct xhci_td *td, dma_addr_t dma)


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-06 10:34 [PATCH 0/4] usb: xhci: improve trb_in_td() Niklas Neronin
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] usb: xhci: refactor trb_in_td() to be static Niklas Neronin
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] usb: xhci: move debug capabilities from trb_in_td() to handle_tx_event() Niklas Neronin
2025-03-05  8:46   ` Michał Pecio
2025-03-05  9:17     ` Neronin, Niklas
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: xhci: rework and simplify trb_in_td() Niklas Neronin
2025-02-19  8:56   ` Michał Pecio
2025-02-19 14:25     ` Mathias Nyman
2025-02-20 12:14     ` [PATCH 5/4 RFC] An alternative dma_in_range() implementation Michał Pecio
2025-02-20 13:18       ` Neronin, Niklas [this message]
2025-02-20 12:25     ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: xhci: rework and simplify trb_in_td() Neronin, Niklas
2025-02-06 10:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] usb: xhci: modify trb_in_td() to be more modular Niklas Neronin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bba69805-b28d-42f2-aa44-107a5700a8d3@linux.intel.com \
    --to=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.