Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list

["Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Ian,

On 9/18/2020 9:36 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020, 6:21 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> On 9/7/2020 4:01 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
>>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>>
>>> On 7/17/2020 2:06 PM, Jin, Yao wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>>> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
>>>>>> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset?
>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and
>>>>>>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX
>>>>>>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree?
>>>>>>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core
>>>>>>> I tried using git am but get:
>>>>>>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
>>>>>>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14
>> @@
>>>>>>> error: could not build fake ancestor
>>>>>>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events
>> to v1.08
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on
>> perf/core branch, is it right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more
>>>>> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly
>>>>> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding
>> edge
>>>>> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to
>>>>> rebase it like before.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Arnaldo
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can this event update be accepted?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jin Yao
>>>
>>> Can this event list update be accepted?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jin Yao
>>
>> Ping again. :)
>>
>> Can this event update patchset be accepted?
>>
>> @Ian, I remembered you had tried this patchset and it's OK right?
>>
> 
> The previous patch didn't apply cleanly. I tested what I had and it solved
> a problem with metrics derived from recent the most recent tma metrics -
> which is great! I will retest with the latest patch.
> 

This patchset can be applied on perf/core. I double checked with the latest perf/core branch.

> Did you have a chance to look at the skylake parallel reads metric? The arb
> thresh modifier isn't present. There are issues with other metrics where
> the units are scaled twice. Have these been resolved?
> 

I will look at the SKL/KBL desktop metric issues. If it needs, I will post another patchset for 
desktop event update.

Thanks
Jin Yao

> Thanks!
> Ian
> 
> 
> Thanks
>> Jin Yao
>>
>