From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=192.55.52.93; helo=mga11.intel.com; envelope-from=james.feist@linux.intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4879Hy12XvzDqRC for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 04:21:16 +1100 (AEDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2020 09:21:12 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,378,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="277524160" Received: from skyhawk.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.54.51.81]) ([10.54.51.81]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2020 09:20:59 -0800 Subject: Re: Redfish OpenBMC OEM To: Gunnar Mills , Joseph Reynolds , "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" Cc: jason.m.bills@linux.intel.com, apparao.puli@linux.intel.com References: <0967abf5-7eb4-8b72-2fe7-d8d4a95ca856@linux.intel.com> <5e21e041-aa40-f1a1-e4eb-9aed63db368a@linux.ibm.com> <2b781d56-e375-96a9-c83d-87e07f0d00dd@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: James Feist Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:20:59 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2b781d56-e375-96a9-c83d-87e07f0d00dd@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:21:18 -0000 > Did we engage Redfish on this one > https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/c/openbmc/bmcweb/+/28699 ? Yes, from the comments: "Was this brought up to DMTF? https://github.com/openbmc/bmcweb/commit/40d68ef6ebe088e4cd0078f8ff4910ca58f2be5d I've created new thread on Redfish forum: https://redfishforum.com/thread/273/extending-virtualmedia-schema-proposal" > > Should the schema go in a different repo, and have a different review > process? Maybe a minimum of N contributing companies have to sign off on > the interface definition of a Redfish "OpenBMC" OEM? Do others have a > similar concern? > > Thanks! > Gunnar >