From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: Wellington Wallace <wellingtonwallace@gmail.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:39:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be104c82-34bb-e11b-e2b7-caccd0a101fc@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002040913290.3236@hadrien>
>> @display@
>> expression X;
>> identifier I;
>> @@
>> *auto I = X(...);
…
> I think it expects a type as well. I don't know if that is a reasonable
> assumption in C or in C++.
How do you think about to interpret such a variable definition in the way
that the omission of an other data type specification would result into
the usage of “int”?
Under which circumstances will the handling of “placeholder type specifiers”
become relevant finally?
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/auto
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 20:45 [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 20:52 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-03 21:13 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 21:28 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 8:11 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 8:14 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 8:39 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2020-02-04 10:38 ` [Cocci] Replacing usages of “auto” with SmPL? Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 11:01 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 11:45 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 12:07 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 12:18 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 21:31 ` [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 8:19 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 12:24 ` [Cocci] Searching for usage of “auto” with SmPL? Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 12:42 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 12:52 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-03 21:00 ` [Cocci] Replacing a std::string check by strcmp() with SmPL wellington wallace
2020-02-04 13:02 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 13:19 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 13:28 ` Markus Elfring
2020-02-04 13:47 ` Julia Lawall
2020-02-04 14:08 ` Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002041524400.3345@hadrien>
2020-02-04 14:42 ` [Cocci] Usage concerns around the SmPL construct “<+... … ...+>” Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be104c82-34bb-e11b-e2b7-caccd0a101fc@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=wellingtonwallace@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.