From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
To: "edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"steffen.klassert@secunet.com" <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"fw@strlen.de" <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: drop secpath extension before skb deferral free
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 07:37:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be732cc7427e09500467e30dd09dac621226568f.camel@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLLk5PvbMa20C=eS0m=chAsgzY-fWnyEsp6L5QouDPcNg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 12:29 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:04 PM Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > In commit 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to
> > per-cpu lists"), skb can be queued on remote cpu list for deferral
> > free.
> >
> > The remote cpu is kicked if the queue reaches half capacity. As
> > mentioned in the patch, this seems very unlikely to trigger
> > NET_RX_SOFTIRQ on the remote CPU in this way. But that seems not
> > true,
> > we actually saw something that indicates this: skb is not freed
> > immediately, or even kept for a long time. And the possibility is
> > increased if there are more cpu cores.
> >
> > As skb is not freed, its extension is not freed as well. An error
> > occurred while unloading the driver after running TCP traffic with
> > IPsec, where both crypto and packet were offloaded. However, in the
> > case of crypto offload, this failure was rare and significantly more
> > challenging to replicate.
> >
> > unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth2 to become free. Usage count =
> > 2
> > ref_tracker: eth%d@000000007421424b has 1/1 users at
> > xfrm_dev_state_add+0xe5/0x4d0
> > xfrm_add_sa+0xc5c/0x11e0
> > xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0xfa/0x240
> > netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
> > xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x31/0x40
> > netlink_unicast+0x1fc/0x2c0
> > netlink_sendmsg+0x232/0x4a0
> > __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
> > ____sys_sendmsg+0x1e3/0x200
> > ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
> > __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
> > do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
> >
> > The ref_tracker shows the netdev is hold when the offloading xfrm
> > state is first added to hardware. When receiving packet, the secpath
> > extension, which saves xfrm state, is added to skb by ipsec offload,
> > and the xfrm state is hence hold by the received skb. It can't be
> > flushed till skb is dequeued from the defer list, then skb and its
> > extension are really freed. Also, the netdev can't be unregistered
> > because it still referred by xfrm state.
> >
> > To fix this issue, drop this extension before skb is queued to the
> > defer list, so xfrm state destruction is not blocked.
> >
> > Fixes: 68822bdf76f1 ("net: generalize skb freeing deferral to per-cpu
> > lists")
> > Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
>
>
> This attribution and patch seem wrong. Also you should CC XFRM
> maintainers.
>
> Before being freed from tcp_recvmsg() path, packets can sit in TCP
> receive queues for arbitrary amounts of time.
>
> secpath_reset() should be called much earlier than in the code you
> tried to change.
Yes, this also fixed the issue if I moved secpatch_reset() before
tcp_v4_do_rcv().
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -2314,6 +2314,7 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
tcp_v4_fill_cb(skb, iph, th);
skb->dev = NULL;
+ secpath_reset(skb);
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
ret = tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk, skb);
Do you want me to send v2, or push a new one if you agree with this
change?
Thanks!
Jianbo
>
> If XFRM state can stick to packets stored in protocol queues, we have
> a much bigger problem.
>
> I suspect all callers of nf_reset_ct() need a fix of some kind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-14 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-13 10:02 [PATCH net] net: drop secpath extension before skb deferral free Jianbo Liu
2024-05-13 10:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-05-14 7:37 ` Jianbo Liu [this message]
2024-05-14 8:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-05-15 3:10 ` Jianbo Liu
2024-05-20 10:06 ` Jianbo Liu
2024-05-21 10:15 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-22 9:34 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-22 11:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-05-23 2:22 ` Jianbo Liu
2024-05-23 6:44 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-23 6:57 ` Jianbo Liu
2024-05-23 10:00 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-23 15:26 ` Jianbo Liu
2024-05-27 7:40 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-28 8:44 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-28 9:02 ` Jianbo Liu
2024-05-28 9:26 ` Steffen Klassert
2024-05-26 10:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be732cc7427e09500467e30dd09dac621226568f.camel@nvidia.com \
--to=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.