From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislav Kholmanskikh Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 19:21:38 +0300 Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 4/5] runtest/commands: adjust names for keyctl01, sysctl01, unshare01 In-Reply-To: <20181002130338.GG24796@rei> References: <1536849882-28897-1-git-send-email-stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com> <1536849882-28897-5-git-send-email-stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com> <20181002130338.GG24796@rei> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it On 10/02/2018 04:03 PM, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > Hi! >> runtest/syscalls already defines tests with these ids, but there >> they point to different commands. In order to avoid name conflicts >> we need to rename tests either in runtest/commands or in runtest/syscalls. >> Since the tests in runtest/syscalls are much older, I chose to rename >> the tests in runtest/commands. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kholmanskikh >> --- >> runtest/commands | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/runtest/commands b/runtest/commands >> index ee7e9f4..f27d2fa 100644 >> --- a/runtest/commands >> +++ b/runtest/commands >> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ which01 which01.sh >> lsmod01 lsmod01.sh >> insmod01 insmod01.sh >> wc01 wc01.sh >> -keyctl01 keyctl01.sh >> +keyctl_01 keyctl01.sh >> gdb01 gdb01.sh >> -unshare01 unshare01.sh >> -sysctl01 sysctl01.sh >> +unshare_01 unshare01.sh >> +sysctl_01 sysctl01.sh > > Hmm, that's a bit hacky. Maybe we should add a _sh suffix to all the > testcases in commands so that it's clear that these are shell scripts. > As if keyctl01 keyctl01.sh was changed to keyctl01_sh keyctl01.sh Correct?