From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] boot: find initrd location from device-tree
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:52:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfbd4f126c427f590198a3e50a789b0c@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbae4506b772f07d2a8c1d230bea82c8@bga.com>
>>> + /* if the initrd is above 4G, its untouchable in 32 bit mode */
>>> + if (initrd_end <= UINT_MAX && initrd_start < initrd_end) {
>>> + loader_info.initrd_addr = initrd_start;
>>> + loader_info.initrd_size = initrd_end - initrd_start;
>>> + } else {
>>> + printf("ignoring loader supplied initrd parameters\n");
>>
>> Saying why might be helpful.
>
> Hmm... well, that would mean seperating the && of the if; there are two
> possible reasons. (1) this 32-bit code can't handle such large
> addresses (in which case a 64-bit kernel may work), and (2) end is >=
> start (which means there really isn't any data. I suppose I could
> reverse the sense of the if, use an else if, and make the final else
> the good path.
"ignoring loader supplied nonsensical initrd parameters"
You do need to fix the comment, though :-)
>>> +#define _LIBC_LIMITS_H_ /* don't recurse to system's
>> headers */
>>> +#include <limits.h> /* MAX_UINT, etc */
>>> +
>>
>> I think it's really a bad idea to use any headers from outside the
>> boot context here. We're dealing with explicit sized ints, so we can
>> safely define our own constants giving the limit values.
>
> As I said in the patch changelog, the only headers picked up here are
> libgcc.
Which the kernel doesn't use. It _should_ be fine
nevertheless, <limits.h> is part of the "freestanding"
headers -- why do you need to do a "libc" trick though?
This doesn't work when not using glibc I guess?
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-15 18:17 [PATCH] boot: find initrd location from device-tree Milton Miller
2007-06-15 19:55 ` Scott Wood
2007-06-18 6:08 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-18 12:52 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-06-19 1:25 ` David Gibson
2007-06-19 6:44 ` Segher Boessenkool
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-15 17:34 Milton Miller
2007-06-18 3:18 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfbd4f126c427f590198a3e50a789b0c@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.