Re: [PATCH] ULL fixes for qlogicfc

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

Followup to:  <20030929172329.GD6526@gtf.org>
By author:    Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:04:34PM +0100, davej@redhat.com wrote:
> > diff -urpN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude bk-linus/drivers/scsi/qlogicfc.c linux-2.5/drivers/scsi/qlogicfc.c
> > --- bk-linus/drivers/scsi/qlogicfc.c	2003-09-08 00:47:00.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.5/drivers/scsi/qlogicfc.c	2003-09-08 01:30:56.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -718,8 +718,8 @@ int isp2x00_detect(Scsi_Host_Template * 
> >  				continue;
> >  
> >  			/* Try to configure DMA attributes. */
> > -			if (pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffffffffffff) &&
> > -			    pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, (u64) 0xffffffff))
> > +			if (pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, 0xffffffffffffffffULL) &&
> > +			    pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, 0xffffffffULL))
> >  					continue;
> 
> Looks great.
> 
> I wonder if you are motivated to create similar pci_set_dma_mask()
> cleanups for other drivers?  ;-)  Several other drivers need this same
> cleanup, too.
> 

Dumb question: why marking these explicitly as ULL instead of letting
the compiler do its usual promotion?

(By all means, remove the explicit cast -- the function call should do
this by itself.)

0xffffffff is unsigned int and will be promoted to
0x00000000ffffffffULL by the function call.  0xffffffffffffffff is UL
on 64-bit platforms and ULL on 32-bit platforms and will be promoted
to 0xffffffffffffffffULL by the function call.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64