Re: XFS for 2.4

[davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen)]

In article <1070410409.3fcd2aa9c0d42@horde.sandall.us>,
Eric Sandall  <eric@sandall.us> wrote:
| Quoting Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>:
| > On Dec-02 2003, Tue, 16:01 -0200
| > Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com> wrote:
| > 
| > 
| > > Its too late for it to be included in 2.4. Use 2.6 or a modified 2.4 tree.
| > 
| > 
| > A: Looking good, come back later, though.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Come back later.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Come back later.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Come back later.
| > B: Ok.
| > A: Sorry, you're too late.
| > B: W--What?
| > A: You heard me.  (Also I don't like your shoes.)
| > 
| > 
| > (Sounds a bit like Monty Python to me, can't help it.)
| 
| You know, that's what I've been thinking this whole time. Almost sounds like
| someone has a grudge against XFS (or something/someone related to XFS).
| 
| Just my non-technical opinion.

You mean like someone just doesn't like the style of the code?
-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.