From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Relative performance of RAID-5 algorithms
Date: 10 Dec 2003 20:21:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <br8rbs$5ac$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
Hi all,
There are four different "checksumming algorithms" -- really, disk
layouts, in Linux. Is there anything "known" about the relative
performance of these? The default for mdadm and mkraid is currently
left-symmetric; is that a sensible default?
I'm asking because I'm trying to get my RAID-6 project going, and
these layouts get a lot more complex with two redundancy drives.
Thus, I'm considering just supporting one disk layout at this point,
and I'd like to pick one :)
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
reply other threads:[~2003-12-11 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='br8rbs$5ac$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.