From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264566AbTLVX2o (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:28:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264568AbTLVX2o (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:28:44 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:17675 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264566AbTLVX2m (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:28:42 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: gatekeeper.tmr.com!davidsen From: davidsen@tmr.com (bill davidsen) Newsgroups: mail.linux-kernel Subject: 2.6.0 modules don't link properly Date: 22 Dec 2003 23:17:03 GMT Organization: TMR Associates, Schenectady NY Message-ID: X-Trace: gatekeeper.tmr.com 1072135023 8956 192.168.12.62 (22 Dec 2003 23:17:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@tmr.com Originator: davidsen@gatekeeper.tmr.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I tried building 2.6.0-final on a new whitebox-3.0-final install, and the modules_install produced thousands of unresolved symbols. This built on another machine I've been running and updating since the 2.5.3x days, so there might be something I've missed, but I don't quite see what it would be. Whitebox is built from RH-ES-3.0 source, so the only things I updated were the procps and modutils, using the last tar which didn't have "pre" in the name. I see that there is a new tar, out nearly ten hours so it must be stable, which has jumped from 0.9.15 to 3.0.15-pre1, but I'm happily using something months old on other systems. Can someone toss me a clue? Has anyone had a working build with RH-ES-3.0? Yes, I know other things need to be done before I can actually run the kernel, but being able to build would be nice, since I got a new test system just for 2.6 test/demo use. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.