From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 102683] mpv confuses the frequency scaling, leading to freqyency flapping and missed vsyncs
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:52:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102683-502@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2637 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102683
Bug ID: 102683
Summary: mpv confuses the frequency scaling, leading to
freqyency flapping and missed vsyncs
Product: DRI
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: DRM/AMDgpu
Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: bugs.freedesktop@haasn.xyz
When rendering e.g. 24 Hz video on 60 Hz, `mpv`'s usage pattern consists of one
“fresh” frame (e.g. 20ms rendering time) followed by two “redraw” frames, each
of which are essentially just blits/mixes of already-rendered frames. This
results in a high-low-low-high-low GPU activity pattern.
Apparently this confuses the GPU frequency scaling quite heavily, which leads
to bad performance (under-scaling), inconsistent performance (“flapping” SCLK)
and missed vblanks (delayed/dropped frames and vsync jitter as measured by
mpv). If I `watch -n0.1 cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/*/amdgpu_pm_info`, I can see
it varying wildly between `SCLK: 500 MHz` and `SCLK: 1000 MHz`, as the reported
`GPU Load:` varies between 0% and 100% from frame to frame. I can consistently
solve the issue by setting `power_dpm_force_performance_level` to `high`.
A graphical explanation of the issue, with mpv performance graphs:
`auto`: https://0x0.st/7qz.jpg
`high`: https://0x0.st/7qi.jpg
This is not just cosmetic, since it results in an increase in the number of
missed vsyncs, due to the occasional spikes. I've also had a different user
report significantly worse performance with 'auto', even more extreme than my
example: https://0x0.st/7Aw.jpg (Note: the third step in this image, going from
10k ms to 5k ms is due to switching from mesa 17.2 to 17.1; but that's an
unrelated, cosmetic bug). Using 'auto' makes mpv completely unusable for this
user.
I expect the solution would be adding a tiny bit of (top-weighted) smoothing of
this performance state / GPU load estimation across frames. The nvidia driver,
for example, gets this right: If I alter between 'high' performance and 'low'
performance states, it recognizes that and sticks to 'high' performance mode,
instead of varying the frequency wildly like amdgpu. This results in very flat
graphs, much like the 'high' screenshot I uploaded.
Kernel version is 4.12.4, mesa version is 17.2.0, device is a Sapphire RX 560.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4058 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-12 16:52 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2017-09-18 1:13 ` [Bug 102683] mpv confuses the frequency scaling, leading to freqyency flapping and missed vsyncs bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-102683-502@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.