19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu
Provided libdrm related packages have MIT licence. But are they built
completely from open source? In the changelog I can see that it is some
amd-mainline-hybrid-master20190125. And actually if I omit these packages w=
hile
using proprietay OpenGL, applications crashes; and clinfo utility crashes w=
ith
segfault. I tested it in Ubuntu 18.04.2, in Ubuntu 19.04 and in Arch Linux.=
In
Ubuntu 19.04 the repo's libraries have the same version as provided in bund=
led
archive. But it was still failing with them (I even tried to place repo's
libraries to /opt location, it did not help).
I want to avoid needing of installation of these libdrm packages
(libdrm-amdgpu-amdgpu1, libdrm-amdgpu-common, libdrm2-amdgpu) because I am
repacking amdgpu-pro for arch linux. Is that possible?
If not, then why do not name these packages and their libraries with -pro
prefix?
Ideally, I want it to use libdrm provided by arch linux. In that case I cou=
ld
even repack all other files to the normal system paths instead of placing a=
ll
to /opt.
List of packages that I still use for Arch are:
libdrm-amdgpu-amdgpu1: provides libdrm_amdgpu.so.1.0.0
libdrm-amdgpu-common: provides amdgpu.ids file that slightly differs from
Arch's standard one
libdrm2-amdgpu: provides 91-amdgpu-pro-modeset.rules libdrm.so.2.4.0
libkms.so.1.0.0