From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 110967] Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:20:03 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0348532795==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E8D6E958 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:20:03 +0000 (UTC) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0348532795== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15611772031.E0A56B1B.10758" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --15611772031.E0A56B1B.10758 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:20:03 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110967 Bug ID: 110967 Summary: Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source Product: DRI Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: DRM/AMDgpu-pro Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: ashark@linuxcomp.ru In 19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu there appeared packages roct-amdgpu-pro = and roct-amdgpu-pro-dev. They have a MIT license, but contains -pro suffix. Is there any specific intention to do so? I thought that only proprietary packages should have that suffix. Also there are packages: amf-amdgpu-pro opencl-amdgpu-pro-comgr opencl-amdgpu-pro-dev opencl-amdgpu-pro-hip What about their suffixes? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --15611772031.E0A56B1B.10758 Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:20:03 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Bug ID 110967
Summary Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close so= urce
Product DRI
Version unspecified
Hardware Other
OS All
Status NEW
Severity enhancement
Priority medium
Component DRM/AMDgpu-pro
Assignee dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter ashark@linuxcomp.ru 

In 19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu there appeared packages roc=
t-amdgpu-pro and
roct-amdgpu-pro-dev.
They have a MIT license, but contains -pro suffix.
Is there any specific intention to do so? I thought that only proprietary
packages should have that suffix.

Also there are packages:
amf-amdgpu-pro
opencl-amdgpu-pro-comgr
opencl-amdgpu-pro-dev
opencl-amdgpu-pro-hip
What about their suffixes?

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --15611772031.E0A56B1B.10758-- --===============0348532795== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVs --===============0348532795==--