All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 115321] radeon runpm falsely disabled on Clevo P170EM
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 13:20:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-115321-2300-nUdO9d94Vn@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-115321-2300@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115321

--- Comment #10 from Christoph Haag <haagch.christoph@googlemail.com> ---
Well, it does not help. I wanted to get you some more info, so I inserted some
printks:

in radeon_atpx_handler.c
static void radeon_atpx_parse_functions(struct radeon_atpx_functions *f, u32
mask)
{
        printk(KERN_ERR "ATPX mask: %u\n", mask);
        printk(KERN_ERR "ATPX power control supported: %u\n",
ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED);
        printk(KERN_ERR "mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED: %u\n", mask &
ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED);
        printk(KERN_ERR "!!(mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED): %u\n",
!!(mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED));

in radeon_device.c
        printk(KERN_ERR "rdev->flags: %u\n", rdev->flags);
        printk(KERN_ERR "rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PX: %u\n", rdev->flags &
RADEON_IS_PX);
        printk(KERN_ERR "radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl(): %u\n",
radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl());
    if ((rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PX) && radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl())
        runtime = true;

Then I booted and got this:

[    6.235984] rdev->flags: 39911477
[    6.238221] rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PX: 33554432
[    6.239947] radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl(): 0
[    6.241572] vga_switcheroo: enabled
[    6.241657] ATPX version 1, functions 0x00000033
[    6.241659] ATPX mask: 51
[    6.243153] ATPX power control supported: 2
[    6.244508] mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED: 2
[    6.245649] !!(mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED): 1

Uhm... so, does that mean the ATPX BIOS version has been fine in the first
place and that radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl() returns 0, just because the
check whether to enable runpm is done BEFORE the atpx stuff is even parsed?

I didn't want to trace everything back to the inits, so I just put another
radeon_atpx_init(); call just before the runpm check, removed static from the
function and added a forward declaration
int radeon_atpx_init(void);
...
        radeon_atpx_init();
        printk(KERN_ERR "rdev->flags: %u\n", rdev->flags);
        printk(KERN_ERR "rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PX: %u\n", rdev->flags &
RADEON_IS_PX);
        printk(KERN_ERR "radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl(): %u\n",
radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl());
    if ((rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PX) && radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl()) {
        runtime = true;
                printk(KERN_ERR "runpm is enabled. Yay\n");
        }

And I got
[    6.223693] ATPX mask: 51
[    6.224823] ATPX power control supported: 2
[    6.225937] mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED: 2
[    6.227140] !!(mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED): 1
[    6.228198] rdev->flags: 39911477
[    6.229274] rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PX: 33554432
[    6.230181] radeon_has_atpx_dgpu_power_cntl(): 1
[    6.231039] runpm is enabled. Yay
[    6.231889] vga_switcheroo: enabled
[    6.231956] ATPX version 1, functions 0x00000033
[    6.231957] ATPX mask: 51
[    6.232267] usbcore: registered new interface driver btusb
[    6.232932] ATPX power control supported: 2
[    6.233849] mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED: 2
[    6.234717] !!(mask & ATPX_POWER_CONTROL_SUPPORTED): 1

YES! IT DOES!

Damn!
Thank you so much for asking a follow up question so I can stop telling people
that the BIOS on several laptops is broken and looking like an idiot.

On the other side: It probably would have been a good idea to verify that there
IS hardware where it actually works as intended before declaring the BIOS to be
at fault.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-16 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-27 10:17 [Bug 115321] New: radeon runpm falsely disabled on Clevo P170EM bugzilla-daemon
2016-04-14  3:26 ` [Bug 115321] " bugzilla-daemon
2016-04-14  3:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-04-14 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-15 13:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-15 14:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-15 15:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-15 15:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-15 19:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-15 19:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-16 13:20 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2016-07-16 13:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-16 13:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-16 13:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-07-16 14:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2016-08-24 14:07 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-115321-2300-nUdO9d94Vn@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.