All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [Bug 1203] ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only with 1 action
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:54:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1203-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3426 bytes --]

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1203

            Bug ID: 1203
           Summary: ice: cannot create 2 rte_flows with 2 actions, only
                    with 1 action
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 23.03
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: ethdev
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: maxime.leroy@6wind.com
  Target Milestone: ---

kernel driver: 1.10.1.2.2
firmware-version: 4.10 0x80015191 1.3310.0
COMMS DDP: 1.3.37
ICE OS Default Package version 1.3.30.0
testpmd cmdline: ./build/app/dpdk-testpmd --log-level=.*ice.*,debug
--legacy-mem -c 7 -a 17:00.0 -a 0000:17:00.1  --  -i --nb-cores=2 --nb-ports=2
--total-num-mbufs=2048


RTE_FLOWS rules can be created
------------------------------


With queue action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end 
actions queue index 0 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created

With mark action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end 
actions mark id 1 / end
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (2) flow
Flow rule #1 created

RTE_FLOWS rules cannot be created
---------------------------------

with mark + queue action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end actions
 mark id 1 / queue index 0 / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 due to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument

with mark + passthru action:

testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 proto is 1  / end actions
mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_rx_parsing_enable(): FDIR processing on RX set to 1
ice_flow_create(): Succeeded to create (1) flow
Flow rule #0 created
testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / ipv4 / udp src is 22 / end actions
 mark id 1 / passthru / end
ice_fdir_cross_prof_conflict(): Failed to create profile for flow type 1 due to
conflict with existing rule of flow type 4.
ice_flow_create(): Failed to create flow
port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 2 (flow rule (handle)): Profile
configure failed.: Invalid argument

Question
--------

1. Does ice nics support to have several actions ?
2. What is the difference between MARK vs MARK+PASSTRHU ?
   It seems to be the same:
   http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=0f664f7d57268f9ab9bdef95f0d48b3ce5004a61
   In this case, there is no reason to support MARK and not MARK+PASSTRHU with
2   flows.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5413 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-1203-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.