From: bugzilla at busybox.net <bugzilla@busybox.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] New: Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 07:55:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-12801-163@https.bugs.busybox.net/> (raw)
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12801
Bug ID: 12801
Summary: Flag '-Wa,--noexecstack' is missing when building
uclibc with newer binutils
Product: buildroot
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: m.patzlaff at pilz.de
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 8436
--> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=8436&action=edit
defconfig to reproduce the issue
When I upgraded buildroot from 2019.02.8 to 2020.02 and re-build my
configuration I noticed that all binaries (executables and shared libraries)
have the executable stack requested in the GNU_STACK program header. I did some
research and also tried to narrow the cause. Eventually I found this:
\ |
binutils \ uclibc | 1.0.31 | 1.0.32
------------------+-----------+---------------
2.30 | fine | fine
2.31.1 | execstack | execstack
2.32 | execstack | execstack
2.33.1 | execstack | execstack
So, until binutils 2.30 everything goes fine. Regardless of what GCC version (I
tested with 4.9 and 8.3.0) I used, the uclibc libraries were marked with
non-executable stack and thus all other binaries were OK too. But starting from
binutils 2.31.1 something goes wrong. In the log for binutils 2.30 + uclibc
1.0.31 one can see, that the flag "-Wa,--noexecstack" is properly passed to the
compiler. In the log for binutils 2.32 + uclibc 1.0.32 this flag is missing.
And here is where I am lost. I can't figure out why because executing the flag
detection in Rules.mak from uclibc manually returns the correct result. And I
also double checked the security options in uclibc-menuconfig.
To reproduce the results above it's best to use the attached defconfig on
buildroot versions 2019.02.8 and 2020.02.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 7:55 bugzilla at busybox.net [this message]
2020-04-22 8:05 ` [Buildroot] [Bug 12801] Flag '-Wa, --noexecstack' is missing when building uclibc with newer binutils bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22 8:05 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22 8:22 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22 11:15 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-22 12:37 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
2020-04-24 12:19 ` bugzilla at busybox.net
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-12801-163@https.bugs.busybox.net/ \
--to=bugzilla@busybox.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.