From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/ethdev Bug 1690] Calling rte_eth_dev_get_module_info() and rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom() for MLX ConnectX-6 spawn errors when transceiver not inserted
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 20:12:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1690-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2440 bytes --]
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1690
Bug ID: 1690
Summary: Calling rte_eth_dev_get_module_info() and
rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom() for MLX ConnectX-6
spawn errors when transceiver not inserted
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: yogev@cgstowernetworks.com
Target Milestone: ---
For Mellanox 'MT2892 Family [ConnectX-6 Dx] 101d'
Calling the dpdk-testpmd's "show port 0 module_eeprom" results in an error when
a transceiver isn't inserted.
The error is spawned from the mlx source:
drivers/net/mlx5/linux/mlx5_ethdev_os.c
In two places:
```
int mlx5_get_module_info(...)
{
...
ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr);
if (ret) {
DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "port %u ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) failed: %s",
dev->data->port_id, strerror(rte_errno));
return ret;
}
...
}
```
And
```
int mlx5_get_module_eeprom(...)
{
...
ret = mlx5_ifreq(dev, SIOCETHTOOL, &ifr);
if (ret)
DRV_LOG(WARNING, "port %u ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) failed: %s",
dev->data->port_id, strerror(rte_errno));
...
}
```
dpdk-testpmd shows:
```
testpmd> show port 0 module_eeprom
mlx5_net: port 0 ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) failed: Input/output error //
<------------ this error.
device is removed
```
When trying to use these functions in my own application, as dpdk-testpmd does:
rte_eth_dev_get_module_info() and rte_eth_dev_get_module_eeprom() this error
log gets printed as well.
An expected result would be to check out the return value and print these
errors if required by the caller.
For my scenario, I would like a silence fail in case there's no transceiver.
I've tried to overcome this by asking first if a device "exists" using
rte_eth_dev_is_removed() and rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port() but they don't reflect
the transceiver state.
A possible solution would be to print these errors in DEBUG
Please advice,
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4427 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-1690-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.