All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/core Bug 1970] fib: trie leaks a tbl8 group and can corrupt the dataplane  when a tbl8 allocation fails during insert
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:27:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1970-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)

http://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1970

            Bug ID: 1970
           Summary: fib: trie leaks a tbl8 group and can corrupt the
                    dataplane  when a tbl8 allocation fails during insert
           Product: DPDK
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: core
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: maxime@leroys.fr
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 356
  --> http://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=356&action=edit
Patch to reproduce the bug

On a full or tight tbl8 pool, an add whose install runs out of tbl8 groups
mid-way
is not rolled back: the group(s) already taken are leaked and the tbl24 entry
already written is left dangling.
trie_modify() undoes only the RIB node (rte_rib6_remove), never the dataplane
or the tbl8 pool. A later, valid add is then wrongly refused with -ENOSPC, and
a multi-interval update can leave the dataplane inconsistent.


Steps to reproduce (fixed pool, no RCU)
---------------------------------------

IPv6 trie, 2-byte next hop, config.trie.num_tbl8 = 1:

    rte_fib6_add(fib, 2001:db8::, 32, nh);   ->  -ENOSPC
    rte_fib6_add(fib, fc00::,     25, nh);   ->  -ENOSPC   (WRONG)

Expected: the /25 needs a single tbl8 group and the pool has capacity
1, so it must succeed. It is refused because the failed /32 leaked the
only group.

Instrumenting tbl8_pool_pos at the modify_dp() call confirms the leak:

    add /32: ret=-ENOSPC, tbl8_pool_pos 0 -> 1  (group taken, not returned)
    add /25: ret=-ENOSPC, tbl8_pool_pos 1 -> 1  (no free group left)

QSBR defer mode (pool of 2, a reader kept non-quiescent):

    add /25 ; delete /25    (group deferred; rsvd_tbl8s back to 0)
    add /32                 ->  passes the reservation check, then leaks
    add /25 (other prefix)  ->  -ENOSPC (WRONG: a group was leaked)

A reproducer is attached (test/fib6). Both new cases fail on current
main:
    0001-test-fib6-reproduce-tbl8-leak-on-failed-trie-insert.patch


Root cause
----------

install_to_dp() (build_common_root()/write_edge()) allocates and
publishes tbl8 groups incrementally and has no failure path: on
tbl8_alloc() failure it returns an error, leaving the partial writes
and the taken groups in place. trie_modify() only removes the RIB node.

Two reasons the pre-check does not prevent it:

1. Transient peak. trie_modify() checks the steady-state footprint:

       if (dp->rsvd_tbl8s + count_empty_levels(node) > dp->number_tbl8s)

   but install_to_dp() transiently needs footprint + 1 for a
   byte-aligned prefix: build_common_root() descends one byte level
   past the prefix and allocates a group there; recycle_root_path()
   frees it only at the end. So the check passes with a pool of one,
   the install takes the first group, then tbl8_alloc() for the
   transient group fails.

2. Logical vs physical, under QSBR defer. rsvd_tbl8s tracks the
   logical reservation, not physical occupancy. In
   RTE_FIB6_QSBR_MODE_DQ a recycled group stays out of the pool until
   a grace period elapses, so rsvd_tbl8s drops while the group is
   still allocated, and the check accepts an add that then fails.

modify_dp() also calls install_to_dp() once per gap around covering
more-specifics; under defer mode each interval's transient group
accumulates, so the peak can exceed footprint + 1, and a failure on a
late interval leaves earlier intervals already written (a lookup in
one range returns the new next hop while another returns the old one).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-1970-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.