From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/cryptodev Bug 1995] CN10K inline IPsec 3DES keys overflow
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 10:27:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-1995-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1995
Bug ID: 1995
Summary: CN10K inline IPsec 3DES keys overflow
Product: DPDK
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: cryptodev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: thomas@monjalon.net
Target Milestone: ---
Group: security
Report date: 2026-03-11
Reported by: 侯朋朋 <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Hello DPDK maintainers,
I am reporting what looks like a real current-head intra-object overflow in the
`cn10k` inline-IPsec Ethernet security path. I rechecked current `main`
(`8dc80afda7a52a1bd28088fe34102e7c1ba17282`) on 2026-03-10 before writing this
mail.
The important point is that the public DPDK security API forwards the
configuration directly into the driver callback:
```c
if (instance->ops->session_create(instance->device, conf, sess)) {
rte_mempool_put(mp, (void *)sess);
return NULL;
}
```
For `cn10k`, the inline Ethernet path then goes straight into the SA fill
helpers:
```c
rc = cnxk_ot_ipsec_outb_sa_fill(outb_sa_dptr, ipsec, crypto, 0);
...
rc = cnxk_ot_ipsec_outb_sa_fill(outb_sa_dptr, ipsec, crypto, 0);
```
and does not first call `cnxk_ipsec_xform_verify()`.
In the shared helper, `3DES` is accepted by setting `enc_type`, but there is no
exact `== 24` runtime check before the copy:
```c
case RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_3DES_CBC:
w2->s.enc_type = ROC_IE_SA_ENC_3DES_CBC;
break;
...
key = cipher_xfrm->cipher.key.data;
length = cipher_xfrm->cipher.key.length;
...
if (key != NULL && length != 0) {
memcpy(cipher_key, key, length);
...
}
```
The capability table for this same path advertises `3DES` as exact-size only:
```c
.key_size = {
.min = 24,
.max = 24,
.increment = 0
},
```
But the runtime inline path above does not enforce that before the copy.
The destination object is:
```c
struct roc_ot_ipsec_outb_sa {
...
uint8_t cipher_key[ROC_CTX_MAX_CKEY_LEN];
union roc_ot_ipsec_outb_iv iv;
...
};
```
with `ROC_CTX_MAX_CKEY_LEN == 32`.
So any `3DES` key longer than `32` bytes writes through `cipher_key[32]` and
into the adjacent live `iv`.
The cleanest current-head case is a `40`-byte `RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_3DES_CBC` key:
- first `32` bytes fill `cipher_key`
- next `8` bytes overwrite the beginning of `iv`
- the helper still returns `0`
- the session-create path proceeds with SA installation
This is why I think this is a strong bug:
- the caller chain is current-head and production, not test code
- the exact-size constraint is published by the driver itself
- the runtime path bypasses the verifier that would have enforced it
- the sink writes attacker-controlled data into a fixed in-object array
- the overwrite reaches a live adjacent member and the path still succeeds
I also prepared a local proof mirroring the current-head layout and write
order. The key outputs are:
- `distance_cipher_key_to_iv=32`
- `advertised_3des_key_max=24`
- `provided_key_len=40`
- `returned=0`
- `overflow_bytes_into_iv=8`
- `iv_prefix_hex=4242424242424242`
- `guard_unchanged=1`
Suggested fix:
1. Enforce exact `3DES` length before `cnxk_ot_ipsec_*_sa_fill()` is reached on
the inline path.
2. Add a local `length <= sizeof(cipher_key)` guard inside the helper before
`memcpy()`.
3. Reuse the same xform verification logic on this inline path that already
exists elsewhere in the `cnxk` IPsec stack.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-1995-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.