From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 199727] CPU freezes in KVM guests during high IO load on host
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:26:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-199727-28872-gXV1Zq937Z@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-199727-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199727
--- Comment #16 from Stefan Hajnoczi (stefanha@gmail.com) ---
On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 08:01, <bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199727
>
> --- Comment #15 from Roland Kletzing (devzero@web.de) ---
> yes, i was using cache=none and io_uring also caused issues.
>
> >aio=threads avoids softlockups because the preadv(2)/pwritev(2)/fdatasync(2)
> > syscalls run in worker threads that don't take the QEMU global mutex.
> >Therefore vcpu threads can execute even when I/O is stuck in the kernel due
> to
> >a lock.
>
> yes, that was a long search/journey to get to this information/params....
>
> regarding io_uring - after proxmox enabled it as default, it was taken back
> again after some issues had been reported.
>
> have look at:
> https://github.com/proxmox/qemu-server/blob/master/debian/changelog
>
> maybe it's not ready for primetime yet !?
>
> -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:53:44
> +0200
> qemu-server (7.0-11) bullseye; urgency=medium
> <snip>
> * lvm: avoid the use of io_uring for now
> <snip>
> -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:08:48
> +0200
> qemu-server (7.0-10) bullseye; urgency=medium
> <snip>
> * avoid using io_uring for drives backed by LVM and configured for
> write-back
> or write-through cache
> <snip>
> -- Proxmox Support Team <support@proxmox.com> Mon, 05 Jul 2021 20:49:50
> +0200
> qemu-server (7.0-6) bullseye; urgency=medium
> <snip>
> * For now do not use io_uring for drives backed by Ceph RBD, with KRBD and
> write-back or write-through cache enabled, as in that case some
> polling/IO
> may hang in QEMU 6.0.
> <snip>
Changelog messages mention cache=writethrough and cache=writeback,
which are both problematic because host memory pressure will interfere
with guest performance. That is probably not an issue with io_uring
per se, just another symptom of using cache=writeback/writethrough in
cases where it's inappropriate.
If you have trace data showing io_uring_enter(2) hanging with
cache=none then Jens Axboe and other io_uring developers may be able
to help resolve that.
Stefan
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-199727-28872@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2021-08-20 17:25 ` [Bug 199727] CPU freezes in KVM guests during high IO load on host bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-21 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-22 12:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-29 14:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-01-13 12:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-10 13:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-12 0:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-12 10:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-24 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-02-25 9:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-02 13:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-07 19:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-08 6:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-08 8:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-08 8:26 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2022-03-26 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-06 23:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-06 23:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-11-29 10:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 13:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-02-01 19:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-08-25 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-08-25 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-08-25 7:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-09 7:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-09 8:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-05-09 9:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-199727-28872-gXV1Zq937Z@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.