All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/other Bug 2033] pipeline: stack buffer overflow via strcat in spec parsing
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:15:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-2033-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033

            Bug ID: 2033
           Summary: pipeline: stack buffer overflow via strcat in spec
                    parsing
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 26.03
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: other
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: yangshuaisong@h-partners.com
  Target Milestone: ---

[Overview]
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the DPDK pipeline library
during the parsing of pipeline specification (.spec) files. The functions
`action_block_parse()` and `apply_block_parse()` in
`lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c` concatenate tokens into a fixed-size
stack buffer without checking the accumulated length, leading to a memory
corruption or crash.

[Location]
- File: lib/pipeline/rte_swx_pipeline_spec.c
- Functions: `action_block_parse()` (lines 467-471) and `apply_block_parse()`
(lines 2155-2158)
- Buffer: `char buffer[RTE_SWX_INSTRUCTION_SIZE]` (256 bytes)

[Environment & Build]
- DPDK Version: [Please enter the scanned DPDK version here, e.g., 23.11 /
24.11 / main]
- OS / Kernel: Generic / Linux
- Tool: Identified via static analysis / manual code review.

[Vulnerability Logic & Analysis]
1. The specification file parser loop (lines 2903-2952) restricts individual
token lengths to less than 64 bytes (`strnlen(token, RTE_SWX_NAME_SIZE) >=
RTE_SWX_NAME_SIZE` triggers "Token too big").
2. However, there is no upper-bound validation on the total accumulated length
of `n_tokens` within a single line. The maximum tokens per line (`MAX_TOKENS`)
is 256, and the maximum line length (`MAX_LINE_LENGTH`) is 2048.
3. In `action_block_parse()` and `apply_block_parse()`, tokens are concatenated
into a 256-byte stack buffer using unbounded `strcat`:
   ```c
   buffer = 0;
   for (i = 0; i < n_tokens; i++) {
       if (i)
           strcat(buffer, " ");
       strcat(buffer, tokens[i]);
   }
   ```
4. Mathematical Proof: If a malicious or malformed .spec file contains a line
with 5 tokens, each 63 bytes long, the total concatenated length becomes: 5 *
63 + 4 (spaces) = 319 bytes.
5. This mathematically exceeds the 255-byte capacity (256 bytes minus 1 null
terminator) of the stack buffer, leading to a definite stack buffer overflow
when processing such a file.

[Actual Results]
No runtime crash has been triggered yet, but static analysis confirms an
unvalidated path leading to a stack-based out-of-bounds write (CVE-2024-11616),
causing potential memory corruption or application crash if an oversized .spec
file is loaded.

[Expected Results]
The token concatenation should safely handle string lengths, and the parser
should reject lines whose accumulated tokens exceed `RTE_SWX_INSTRUCTION_SIZE -
1`.

[Suggested Fix]
Replace the unbounded `strcat` with bounded string operations (`strncat` or
`snprintf`) that consider the remaining space in the destination buffer, for
example:
```c
buffer = 0;
for (i = 0; i < n_tokens; i++) {
    if (i)
        strncat(buffer, " ", sizeof(buffer) - strlen(buffer) - 1);
    strncat(buffer, tokens[i], sizeof(buffer) - strlen(buffer) - 1);
}
```
Alternatively, add a pre-check validation on the total length before entering
the concatenation loop, and return an error if it exceeds the limit.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-09-10 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-2033-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.